ArticleJournal of equine veterinary science2022
Factors Influencing Veterinarian Opinion on Reporting of Equine Strangles in the United States.
Article in Journal of equine veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of novel Streptococcus equi vaccines with an assessment of their immunizing potentials and protective efficacies.BMC veterinary research · 2024Article
- Evaluating Trends in Strangles Outbreaks Using Temperature and Precipitation Data in the United States of America for 2018-2022.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although equine strangles is reportable in all states, synchronous reporting of this disease does not occur across the country. States have variable regulations on reporting (actionable, notifiable, and monitored) and no mandatory comprehensive databases exist for tracking prevalence. In this study, we solicited veterinarians' opinions on reporting of strangles and factors influencing their opinion. Two hundred and fifty veterinarians practicing within the United States A structured survey was administered online. A total of 250 veterinarians participated: 84 participants (34%) believed that strangles should continue to be nationally monitored and that individual states should have jurisdiction over laboratory-confirmed positive cases; 58 (23.2%) believed strangles should become nationally monitored with mandatory notification of positive cases to a central forum; 24 participants (9.6%) thought strangles should become notifiable nationally; and 44 (17.6%) thought strangles should become notifiable and actionable. Veterinarians who were currently in the habit of reporting strangles were also more likely to want increased reporting (Or=1.87), though this association was not quite statistically significant (P = 0.054), as did veterinarians who ranked strangles as "very important" or "important" relative to other infectious disease (OR 3.77, P = .037). Veterinarians practicing in the Southwest (P = .01) and West (P = .04) were significantly less likely than northeast practitioners to rank strangles of higher importance. Opinions on equine strangles and desire for increased reporting were varied in the sampled veterinary community. Information obtained in this study regarding veterinarians' current views on strangles reporting could inform future policy regarding the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.