Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35417660›Full record

ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models to Predict Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multi-Center Retrospective Radiomics Study.

Yafeng Liu, Jiawei Zhou, Jing Wu, Wenyang Wang, Xueqin Wang, Jianqiang Guo, Qingsen Wang, Xin Zhang, Danting Li, Jun Xie and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yafeng LiuSchool of Medicine, 91594Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, P.R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3930-4872
Jiawei ZhouSchool of Medicine, 91594Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, P.R. China.
Jing WuSchool of Medicine, 91594Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, P.R. China.
Wenyang WangSchool of Medicine, 91594Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, P.R. China.
Xueqin WangSchool of Medicine, 91594Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, P.R. China.
Jianqiang GuoSchool of Medicine, 91594Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, P.R. China.
Qingsen WangSchool of Medicine, 91594Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, P.R. China.
Xin ZhangSchool of Medicine, 91594Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, P.R. China.
Danting LiSchool of Medicine, 91594Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, P.R. China.
Jun XieKey Laboratory of Industrial Dust Prevention and Control & Occupational Safety and Health of the Ministry of Education, 91594Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, P.R. China.
Xuansheng DingSchool of Medicine, 91594Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, P.R. China.
Yingru XingSchool of Medicine, 91594Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, P.R. China.
Dong HuSchool of Medicine, 91594Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, P.R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8995-4729

Funding

TP-R: a novel mediator of obesity-linked insulin resistance in humansI01CX002084 · VA · OMAHA VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI DESOUZA, CYRUS V, VISWANATHAN, SARASWATHI · 2021 to 2025
–
CSRD VA I01 CX002084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop and validate a generalized prediction model that can classify epidermal growth factor receptor

methodsA total of 346 patients (296 in the training cohort and 50 in the validation cohort) from four centers were included in this retrospective study. First, 1085 features were extracted using IBEX from the computed tomography images. The features were screened using the intraclass correlation coefficient, hypothesis tests and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. Logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) were used to build a radiomics model for classification. The models were evaluated using the following metrics: area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve (CAL), decision curve analysis (DCA), concordance index (C-index), and Brier score.

resultsSixteen features were selected, and models were built using LR, DT, RF, and SVM. In the training cohort, the AUCs was .723, .842, .995, and .883; In the validation cohort, the AUCs were .658, 0567, .88, and .765. RF model with the best AUC, its CAL, C-index (training cohort=.998; validation cohort=.883), and Brier score (training cohort=.007; validation cohort=0.137) showed a satisfactory predictive accuracy; DCA indicated that the RF model has better clinical application value.

conclusionMachine learning models based on computed tomography images can be used to evaluate

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsErbB ReceptorsHumansMachine LearningMutationRetrospective StudiesErbB Receptorscomputed tomographyepidermal growth factor receptormachine learningnon–small cell lung cancerradiomics

Identifiers

PMID35417660
PMCPMC9016531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.