ArticlePloS one2022
Happy work: Improving enterprise human resource management by predicting workers' stress using deep learning.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Erudit AI SaaS: an artificial intelligence tool based on RoBERTa for classifying employee engagement.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Article
- Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and quantitative weight analysis in structure management of human resources.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, workers in most enterprises suffer from excessive occupational stress in the workplace, which negatively affects workers' productivity, safety, and health. To deal with stress in workers, it is vital for the human resource management (HRM) department to manage stress effectively, bridging the gap between management and stressed employees. To manage stress effectively, the first step is to predict workers' stress and detect the factors causing stress among workers. Existing methods often rely on the stress assessment questionnaire, which may not be effective to predict workers' stress, due to 1) the difficulty of collecting the questionnaire data, and 2) the bias brought by workers' subjectivity when completing the questionnaires. In this paper, we aim to address this issue and accurately predict workers' stress status based on Deep Learning (DL) approach. We develop two stress prediction models (i.e., stress classification model and stress regression model) and correspondingly design two neural network architectures. We train these two stress prediction models based on workers' data (e.g., salary, working time, KPI). By conducting experiments over two real-world datasets: ESI and HAJP, we validate that our proposed deep learning-based approach can effectively predict workers' stress status with 71.2% accuracy in the classification model and 11.1 prediction loss in the regression model. By accurately predicting workers' stress status with our method, the HRM of enterprises can be improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.