ReviewHistology and histopathology2022
Limitations and challenges of direct cell reprogramming in vitro and in vivo.
Review in Histology and histopathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering the geriatric heart to model HFpEF.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- The SynMuvA lin-15A licenses natural transdifferentiation by antagonizing identity safeguarding mechanisms.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- SGLT2 Inhibitor Dapagliflozin Attenuates Cardiomyocyte Injury and Inflammation Induced by PI3Kα-Selective Inhibitor Alpelisib and Fulvestrant Under Hyperglycemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Marine Bioactives in Liver Aging: Mechanistic Insights and Translational Potential.Marine drugs · 2026Review
- Psoralen Promotes Direct Chemical Reprogramming of Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts into Osteoblast-like Cells.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Navigating the landscape of direct cellular reprogramming with DiReG.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- Immunocyte reprogramming empowers live-cell drug delivery: Mechanistic insights, delivery strategies, and clinical perspectives.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- Skeletal muscle reprogramming in peripheral nerve injury: mechanisms, therapeutic roles, and complication management.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Direct in vivo reprogramming to relieve tissue ischemia via induced vasculogenesis.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Review
- Cell and tissue reprogramming: Unlocking a new era in medical drug discovery.Pharmacological reviews · 2025Review
- Engineering fibroblast with reprogramming and spheronization for bone defect repair.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- Acoustofluidic bioassembly induced morphogenesis for therapeutic tissue fabrication.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Challenges and Efficacy of Astrocyte-to-Neuron Reprogramming in Spinal Cord Injury: In Vitro Insights and In Vivo Outcomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Exosomes enriched with miR-124-3p show therapeutic potential in a new microfluidic triculture model that recapitulates neuron-glia crosstalk in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Direct Reprogramming of Fibroblasts to Osteoblasts: Techniques and Methodologies.Stem cells translational medicine · 2024Review
- ETV2/ER71, the key factor leading the paths to vascular regeneration and angiogenic reprogramming.Stem cell research & therapy · 2023Review
- Three Tiers to biological escape velocity: The quest to outwit aging.Aging medicine (Milton (N.S.W)) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Direct reprogramming, whether in vitro or in vivo, has attracted great attention because of its advantages of convenience, short-term conversion, direct targets, no immune rejection, and potential clinical applications. In addition, due to its independence from the pluripotent state, direct programming minimizes some safety concerns associated with the use of human pluripotent stem cells. However, the significant limitations of reprogrammed cells, such as poor proliferative ability, low efficiency, and immature function, need to be addressed before the clinical application potential can be expanded. Here, we review the recent achievements of direct reprogramming in 2D and 3D systems in vitro and in vivo, covering cells derived from the three germ layers from stem/progenitor cells to terminal cells, such as hepatocytes, pancreatic β cells, cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells, osteoblasts, chondrocytes, neurons, and melanocytes. Combining our lab experiences with current work, we summarize the practical and potential issues that need to be solved and the prospects of strategies for addressing the current dilemmas. Through comprehensive analyses, it is concluded that the directions for dealing with efficiency and functionality issues could be the optimization of transcription factors, the upgradation for delivery systems, the regulation of epigenetic factors and pathways, and the improvement of cellular maintenance conditions. Besides, converting cells into the progenitor state firstly and then differentiating them into the desired cell types with chemical compounds may provide an approach to obtaining functional and safe converted cells in batches with a better proliferative ability. With the emergence of more and more direct reprogramming techniques and approaches with both safety and effectiveness, it is bound to bring a new dawn for mechanism research and therapeutic applications for relevant diseases in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35417038What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.