ArticleeLife2022
Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- TRP Channels from Sensory Coding to Physiology.Metabolites · 2025Review
- TRPγ regulates lipid metabolism througheLife · 2025Article
- A brief history of insect neuropeptide and peptide hormone research.Cell and tissue research · 2025Review
- Exploring the multifaceted functions of APPL in metabolism and memory using Drosophila melanogaster.Molecules and cells · 2025Article
- Acid and Alkali Taste Sensation.Metabolites · 2023Review
- Descending GABAergic pathway links brain sugar-sensing to peripheral nociceptive gating in Drosophila.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Article
- Molecular sensors in the taste system of Drosophila.Genes & genomics · 2023Review
- Endocrine cybernetics: neuropeptides as molecular switches in behavioural decisions.Open biology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The mechanism through which the brain senses the metabolic state, enabling an animal to regulate food consumption, and discriminate between nutritional and non-nutritional foods is a fundamental question. Flies choose the sweeter non-nutritive sugar, L-glucose, over the nutritive D-glucose if they are not starved. However, under starvation conditions, they switch their preference to D-glucose, and this occurs independent of peripheral taste neurons. Here, we found that eliminating the TRPγ channel impairs the ability of starved flies to choose D-glucose. This food selection depends on
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.