Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35416763›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2022

Understanding the meanings of male partner support in the adherence to therapy among HIV-positive women: a gender analysis.

Isotta Triulzi, Claire Somerville, Salimu Sangwani, Ilaria Palla, Stefano Orlando, Hawa Sangare Mamary, Fausto Ciccacci, Maria Cristina Marazzi, Giuseppe Turchetti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Isotta TriulziInstitute of Management, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1421-7863
Claire SomervilleGender Center, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2335-160X
Salimu SangwaniDream Programme, Community of Sant'Egidio, Blantyre, Malawi.ORCID 0000-0002-7543-8512
Ilaria PallaInstitute of Management, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4126-5721
Stefano OrlandoDepartment of Biomedicine, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9706-4075
Hawa Sangare MamaryDream Programme, Community of Sant'Egidio, Blantyre, Malawi.ORCID 0000-0002-8766-4349
Fausto CiccacciUniCamillus, Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0262-707X
Maria Cristina MarazziDepartment of Human Science, Lumsa University, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2031-5213
Giuseppe TurchettiInstitute of Management, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1877-5459
Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna · ITGraduate Institute of International and Development Studies · CHLibera Università Maria SS. Assunta · ITSaint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious literature reports that low male partner support is a barrier to women's adherence and retention in HIV care programs.

objectiveThis qualitative study explored the relationships between partners to understand what is meant by male partner support in adherence of HIV-positive women in four healthcare facilities in Southern Malawi.

methodsWe conducted 8 semi-structured focus group discussions (FGDs) with 73 participants (40 men and 33 women) and 10 in-depth interviews (IDIs) between August 2018 to December 2019. Participants were HIV-positive patients, healthcare workers (HCWs), expert patients (EPs), and couples attending the clinic. All data were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using a gender-responsive grounded theory approach.

resultsThis study confirms previous literature, which suggests male partner support is expressed by providing access to transport to the clinic and accompaniment to appointments. However, we found that men can also control access to resources and decision-making. Support is more complex than previous literature reported and, in some cases, gender norms significantly limit women's capacity to engage in care independently of male support since women need male partner permission to access the resources to attend clinics.

conclusionsThis paper suggests that restrictive male-partner gender norms limit women's power to engage in care. Most importantly, the gender analysis reveals that what previous literature describes as male partner support can sometimes hide male partner control in permitting access to resources to attend health facilities. For this reason, policies enhancing male support should consider the gender power relationship between partners to avoid reinforcing gender inequality.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsFemaleFocus GroupsGender IdentityHumansMaleQualitative ResearchSexual PartnersSocial SupportgenderHIV/AIDSmale involvementpartner’s supportsexual and reproductive health

Identifiers

PMID35416763
PMCPMC9009925
OpenAlexW4223628412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.