ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2022
Patient and provider perspectives on using goal attainment scaling in care planning for older adults with complex needs.
Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The impact of integrated care on quality of life in community-dwelling older adults with frailty: A systematic review and mixed method synthesis.The Journal of frailty & aging · 2026Pooled it
- A systematic review of goal attainment scaling implementation practices by caregivers in randomized controlled trials.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Pooled it
- Goal attainment scaling in the heart failure and stroke resilience caregiver intervention pilot study.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Trial
- Evaluating Goal Attainment Scaling for Individuals With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia in Rehabilitation Settings.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2025Article
- An individualized physical function improvement program for frailty elderly using goal attainment scaling (GAS) as evaluation method: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Understanding how older people with mild frailty engage with behaviour change to support their independence: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Clinician and Researcher Experiences with Goal Attainment Scaling: A Qualitative Study on Opportunities and Challenges for Personalized Outcome Assessments.Patient related outcome measures · 2025Article
- Exploring Goal Attainment Scaling Among Occupational Therapy Students: A Retrospective Descriptive Analysis.Occupational therapy international · 2025Article
- Using Progress Feedback to Enhance Treatment Outcomes: A Narrative Review.Administration and policy in mental health · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Feasibility of Goal Attainment Scaling as a patient-reported outcome measure for older patients in primary care.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAssess the feasibility of using goal attainment scaling (GAS) in care planning for older adults with complex needs. GAS is an individualized approach to goal setting and follow up using a quantified scale. To date, little is known about the feasibility of GAS among this population.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative study with a sample of 28 older adults and 23 providers from diverse settings to evaluate the value and challenges of this approach. We conducted semi-structured interviews and iteratively coded and analyzed interview transcripts for themes related to value, challenges, and implementation.
resultsMost older adults and providers reported that the GAS approach added value to the care encounter. GAS supported collaboration and patient accountability for their goals, though it could be demotivating to some patients. Some older adults and providers noted that GAS could be confusing and that it was uncomfortable to talk about negative outcomes (i.e., the - 2 and - 1 boxes of the scale). Factors that facilitated implementation included using visual copies of the GAS forms, having an established patient-provider relationship, practicing the approach, and having previous goal-related clinical training.
conclusionsGAS was feasible to implement across diverse settings, and, despite challenges, both older adults and providers reported that it added value to care planning encounters with the potential to improve delivery of person-centered care. Further efforts to demonstrate the applicability and benefit of this method for older adults are warranted, particularly to address implementation of the approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.