Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35416608›Full record

SynthesisBrain imaging and behavior2022

Volume, density, and thickness brain abnormalities in mild cognitive impairment: an ALE meta-analysis controlling for age and education.

Philip J Raine, Hengyi Rao

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brain imaging and behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Philip J RaineSchool of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Gregory Hall, 107 Van Pelt Manor, 3909 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. rainepj@sas.upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6464-812X
Hengyi RaoCenter for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research & Key Laboratory of Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, China.
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USShanghai International Studies University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior meta-analyses have provided important information regarding which brain areas are structurally compromised in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). These studies have not however separated volume, density, and thickness, controlled for important demographic influences, considered null findings, or recognized studies indicating increased brain volumes in MCI individuals. Furthermore, there is a question as to whether deficits extend into cortical regions, and also into the thalamus. This study aims to address these issues using activation likelihood estimation (ALE) analyses with a sample size more than twice that of prior meta-analyses. A total of 71 studies were identified and entered into the ALE analysis which consisted of 2262 with MCI and 1902 healthy controls. Three major clusters were identified showing decreased gray matter volume in the MCI group compared to controls, with the most salient decreases being in the hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and the amygdala. Reduced thalamic volume was also observed, but to a lesser extent. Density was reduced in the left hippocampus, while thickness was reduced in the uncus. No significant cluster emerged from an ALE meta-analysis of studies finding volume increases in MCI individuals. While the MCI group was significantly older and less educated than controls, controlling for these factors still resulted in significant, albeit attenuated findings. These results support hippocampal and parahippocampal deficits in MCI, and further highlight the amygdala, thalamus, and uncus as other areas to be considered in future MCI studies.

Indexed as

Brain DiseasesCognitive DysfunctionBrainGray MatterHippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingAmygdalaBrain structurehippocampusMild cognitive impairmentParahippocampal

Identifiers

PMID35416608
OpenAlexW4223543455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.