Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35416575›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neuro-oncology2022

Immune-related aseptic meningitis and strategies to manage immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a systematic review.

Simon Nannini, Larysa Koshenkova, Seyyid Baloglu, Dominique Chaussemy, Georges Noël, Roland Schott

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase ReportsSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Neurologic Complications of Cancer Immunotherapy.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simon NanniniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Strasbourg-Europe Cancer Institute (ICANS), 67200, Strasbourg, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3097-727X
Larysa KoshenkovaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Strasbourg-Europe Cancer Institute (ICANS), 67200, Strasbourg, France.
Seyyid BalogluDepartment of Radiology, Strasbourg University Hospital 67033, Strasbourg, France.
Dominique ChaussemyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Strasbourg University Hospital 67033, Strasbourg, France.
Georges NoëlDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Strasbourg-Europe Cancer Institute (ICANS), 67200, Strasbourg, France.
Roland SchottDepartment of Medical Oncology, Strasbourg-Europe Cancer Institute (ICANS), 67200, Strasbourg, France. r.schott@icans.eu.
Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg · FRUniversité de Strasbourg · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can induce adverse neurological effects. Due to its rarity as an adverse effect, meningitis has been poorly described. Therefore, meningitis diagnosis and management can be challenging for specialists. Moreover, meningitis can be an obstacle to resuming immunotherapy. Given the lack of alternatives, the possibility of reintroducing immunotherapy should be discussed on an individual basis. Here, we present a comprehensive systematic review of meningitis related to ICIs. REVIEW: We performed a search for articles regarding immune-related meningitis published in PubMed up to November 2021 with the MeSH terms "meningitis" and "immune checkpoint" using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method. We summarized the studies not only by category but also based on whether it was a primary article or case report to provide a systematic overview of the subject. We reviewed a total of 38 studies and herein report the clinical experiences, pharmacovigilance data and group knowledge from these studies.

conclusionThis review summarizes the existing information on immune-related meningitis and the possibility of reintroducing immunotherapy after the development of central neurological side effects. To the best of our knowledge, there is little information in the literature to guide clinicians on decisions regarding whether immunotherapy should be continued after a neurological adverse event occurs, especially meningeal events. This review emphasizes the necessity of systematic examinations, steroid treatment (as a cornerstone of management) and the need for further exploratory studies to obtain a clearer understanding of how to better manage patients who experience these side effects. The findings summarized in this review can help provide guidance to practitioners who face this clinical situation.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsMeningitisMeningitis, AsepticHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsAseptic meningitisImmune-related adverse eventImmunotherapyMelanomaReintroduction

Identifiers

PMID35416575
PMCPMC9458695
OpenAlexW4223531225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.