Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35416544›Full record

SynthesisLung2022

Objective and Subjective Measurement of Cough in Asthma: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Joshua Holmes, Liam G Heaney, Lorcan P A McGarvey

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Lung, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joshua HolmesWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5323-1927
Liam G HeaneyWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Belfast, UK.
Lorcan P A McGarveyWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Belfast, UK. l.mcgarvey@qub.ac.uk.
Queen's University Belfast · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M016579/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe extent to which objective and subjective tools has been used to measure the characteristics and burden of cough in patients with asthma has not been reported.

objectiveTo review the large and extensive body of literature in asthma with the specific hypothesis that the characteristics of cough and clinical impact in this disease has only occasionally been studied.

methodsFor this systematic review, we searched EMBASE and MEDLINE databases using a combination of MeSH terms for "cough" and "asthma" for studies published up to and including end of August 2021. Studies included for analysis were confined to those undertaken in adult patients (≥ 18 years) with asthma of any severity where any tool or method to specifically measure cough was employed.

resultsOf 12,090 citations identified after our initial search, 112 full-text articles met criteria for inclusion in our analysis. We found that a broad range of objective and subjective measures have been used albeit with a lack of consistency between studies. Clinically important levels of cough associated with impaired health status were identified in patients with asthma.

conclusionAlthough cough is a common symptom in asthma, the clinical features and accompanying healthcare burden have been studied infrequently. In studies where cough was measured, the methods employed varied considerably. A more consistent use of cough-specific measurement tools is required to better determine the nature and burden of cough in asthma.

Indexed as

AsthmaCoughAdultHealth ServicesHealth StatusHumansAsthmaCoughObjectiveSubjective

Identifiers

PMID35416544
PMCPMC9038879
OpenAlexW4223500664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.