Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35416490›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2022

Effect of primary and secondary Fasciola gigantica infection on specific IgG responses, hepatic enzyme levels and weight gain in buffaloes.

Jin-Hui Wang, Kang-Xin He, Zhen-Di Wang, Chong-Li Wen, Xiao-Ge Han, Zhen Meng, Xiang-Xiang Yuan, Zheng-Jiao Wu, Wei-Yu Zhang, Wen-Da Di

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Field Evidence ofVaccines · 2025
    Article
  2. The 22nd Chromatography Component of theAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  3. Secondary infection ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  4. Proteomic analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jin-Hui WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530005, People's Republic of China.
Kang-Xin HeCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530005, People's Republic of China.
Zhen-Di WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530005, People's Republic of China.
Chong-Li WenGuangxi Buffalo Research Institute, Chinese Academy Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, Guangxi, 530001, People's Republic of China.
Xiao-Ge HanCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530005, People's Republic of China.
Zhen MengCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530005, People's Republic of China.
Xiang-Xiang YuanCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530005, People's Republic of China.
Zheng-Jiao WuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530005, People's Republic of China.
Wei-Yu ZhangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530005, People's Republic of China. zweiyu@gxu.edu.cn.
Wen-Da DiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530005, People's Republic of China. diwenda@gxu.edu.cn.
Guangxi University · CNGuangxi Buffalo Research Institute · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31960706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Buffaloes, as highly susceptible definitive hosts of Fasciola gigantica, suffer from a high infection rate of fasciolosis, which causes enormous economic losses. Repeat infection is responsible for this high rate; thus, elucidating the protective immunity mechanism in repeat infection is decisive in fasciolosis prevention. Herein, a secondary experimental infection model was established to preliminarily reveal the protective immunity that occurs in repeat infection. In brief, animals were assigned to three groups: group A (uninfected control), group B (primary infection) and group C (secondary infection). Buffaloes were autopsied 20 weeks post-infection for measurements of the recovered flukes and hepatic examination. In addition, the detection of specific antibody (IgG) responses to F. gigantica excretory-secretory product (FgESP) throughout the whole period and weight gain throughout the first 4 months as a percentage (%) of the starting weight were also determined. The serum hepatic enzyme gamma glutathione transferase (GGT) levels were monitored to assess hepatic damage throughout the study period. Infection establishment was compared between group B and group C. Similar specific IgG patterns were observed between group B and group C, and hepatic damage was more severe in group C than group B. Significant differences in weight gain as a percentage of the start weight were observed between group A and group B at the 3rd and 4th months postprimary infection, while significant differences were not observed between group A and group C or group B and group C. Our results suggest that challenge infection cannot induce resistance against F. gigantica in buffaloes, which is consistent with the protective immunity against Fasciola hepatica reinfection observed in sheep and goats.

Indexed as

BisonFasciolaFascioliasisSheep DiseasesAnimalsAntibodies, HelminthBuffaloesImmunoglobulin GSheepWeight GainAntibodies, HelminthImmunoglobulin GAntibodyELISAImmunityReinfection

Identifiers

PMID35416490
OpenAlexW4223527266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.