Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35416093›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS

Pasture access and eye temperature in dairy cows.

Andrew Crump, Kirsty Jenkins, Emily J Bethell, Conrad P Ferris, Gareth Arnott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew CrumpInstitute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Kirsty JenkinsInstitute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Emily J BethellSchool of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Conrad P FerrisSustainable Agri-Food Sciences Division, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, UK.
Gareth ArnottInstitute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pasture access can benefit dairy cows' behavior, health, and welfare, but herds are increasingly housed indoors full-time. Recent infrared thermal-imaging (thermography) studies suggest that higher eye temperatures may be a physiological indicator of chronic stress. We, therefore, hypothesized that, compared to cows with pasture access, cows housed indoors full-time would have higher eye temperatures. In a two-phase crossover experiment, 29 Holstein-Friesian dairy cows experienced 18 days of overnight pasture access and 18 days of full-time indoor housing. We measured each animal's eye temperature 16 times (eight/phase). During Phase One, cows with pasture access had higher eye temperatures than cows housed indoors full-time (contrary to our hypothesis). However, during Phase Two, cows with pasture access had lower eye temperatures than cows housed indoors full-time. It is, therefore, unclear whether eye temperature reflected disparities in dairy cow welfare between different housing treatments.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalLactationAnimalsCattleDairyingFemaleHousing, AnimalTemperatureAnimal welfarecontinuous housingthermographyzero-grazing

Identifiers

PMID35416093
PMCPMC11789712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.