Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35415811›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2022

Multicenter cohort study on the presentation and treatment of acute appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Demi Huijgen, Elisabeth M L de Wijkerslooth, Josephine C Janssen, Frédérique H Beverdam, Evert-Jan G Boerma, Jan Willem T Dekker, Sophia Kitonga, Charles C van Rossem, Wilhelmina H Schreurs, Boudewijn R Toorenvliet and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Demi HuijgenDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Elisabeth M L de WijkersloothDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Josephine C JanssenDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Frédérique H BeverdamDepartment of Surgery, Franciscus Hospital & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Evert-Jan G BoermaDepartment of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Jan Willem T DekkerDepartment of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands.
Sophia KitongaDepartment of Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Charles C van RossemDepartment of Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Wilhelmina H SchreursDepartment of Surgery, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Boudewijn R ToorenvlietDepartment of Surgery, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten VermaasDepartment of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle Aan Den IJssel, The Netherlands.
Bas P L WijnhovenDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Anne Loes van den BoomDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. a.vandenboom@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5502-964X
Erasmus MC · NLFranciscus Vlietland · NLIJsselland Ziekenhuis · NLIkazia Ziekenhuis · NLMaasstad Ziekenhuis · NLMedisch Centrum Leeuwarden · NLNorthwest Hospital · USReinier de Graaf Hospital · NLZuyderland Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

ZonMw 848015008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCurrent studies have demonstrated conflicting results regarding surgical care for acute appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to assess trends in diagnosis as well as treatment of acute appendicitis in the Netherlands during the first and second COVID-19 infection wave.

methodsAll consecutive patients that had an appendectomy for acute appendicitis in nine hospitals from January 2019 to December 2020 were included. The primary outcome was the number of appendectomies for acute appendicitis. Secondary outcomes included time between onset of symptoms and hospital admission, proportion of complex appendicitis, postoperative length of stay and postoperative infectious complications. Outcomes were compared between the pre-COVID group and COVID group.

resultsA total of 4401 patients were included. The mean weekly rate of appendectomies during the COVID period was 44.0, compared to 40.9 in the pre-COVID period. The proportion of patients with complex appendicitis and mean postoperative length of stay in days were similar in the pre-COVID and COVID group (respectively 35.5% vs 36.8%, p = 0.36 and 2.0 ± 2.2 vs 2.0 ± 2.6, p = 0.93). There were no differences in postoperative infectious complications. A computed tomography scan was used more frequently as a diagnostic tool after the onset of COVID-19 compared to pre-COVID (13.8% vs 9.8%, p < 0.001, respectively).

conclusionNo differences were observed in number of appendectomies, proportion of complex appendicitis, postoperative length of stay or postoperative infectious complications before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. A CT scan was used more frequently during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

AppendicitisCOVID-19Acute DiseaseAppendectomyCohort StudiesHumansLength of StayPandemicsPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesAppendectomyAppendicitisCOVID-19Surgery

Identifiers

PMID35415811
PMCPMC9005243
OpenAlexW4223475130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.