SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2022
Psychometric properties of the Facial Disability Index in patients with facial palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of Kinesio tape for central facial paralysis: A prospective, randomized sham-controlled, single-blinded clinical trial.Medicine · 2026Trial
- Article
- Beyond motor recovery: emerging perspectives in the management of peripheral facial palsy-a narrative review.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Short-term clinical outcomes associated with a standardized multicomponent facial rehabilitation program in acute or early-subacute peripheral facial nerve palsy: a prospective controlled cohort study.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of the study was to present the systematic review and meta-analysis of the psychometrical analysis of Facial Disability Index (FDI) studies.
methodsA literature search was conducted in the relevant electronic databases "PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science (WoS), and Cochrane Library." A total of 621 articles were obtained by searching the relevant keywords (PubMed: 384, Cochrane Library: 14, Web of Science: 132, Scopus: 91). A total of 8 papers were included. The four-point classification and rating-based "COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN)" tools were used to evaluate the bias risk and evidence levels.
resultsCronbach's alpha pooling of FDI total score was (ES): 0.803 (95% CI: 0.73-0.86). Heterogeneity for the Facial Disability Index-Physical Function (FDI-PF) and Facial Disability Index-Social Function (FDI-SF) subscore based on intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were I
conclusionFDI is a psychometrically valuable questionnaire, especially for the internal consistency, reliability, and validity. In clinical practice, the use of FDI would be valuable, in addition to clinician-based grading, to see more of patients' social influences precisely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35415807What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.