Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35415776›Full record

ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2023

Emoji Identification and Emoji Effects on Sentence Emotionality in ASD-Diagnosed Adults and Neurotypical Controls.

Christopher J Hand, Ashley Kennedy, Ruth Filik, Melanie Pitchford, Christopher M Robus

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher J HandSchool of Education, University of Glasgow, 11 Eldon Street, Glasgow, G3 6NH, UK. Christopher.Hand@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1536-4005
Ashley KennedyDepartment of Psychology, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Ruth FilikSchool of Psychology, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Melanie PitchfordSchool of Psychology, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, UK.
Christopher M RobusSchool of Psychotherapy and Psychology, Regents University London, London, UK.
Glasgow Caledonian University · GBRegent's University London · GBUniversity of Bedfordshire · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated ASD-diagnosed adults' and neurotypical (NT) controls' processing of emoji and emoji influence on the emotionality of otherwise-neutral sentences. Study 1 participants categorised emoji representing the six basic emotions using a fixed-set of emotional adjectives. Results showed that ASD-diagnosed participants' classifications of fearful, sad, and surprised emoji were more diverse and less 'typical' than NT controls' responses. Study 2 participants read emotionally-neutral sentences; half paired with sentence-final happy emoji, half with sad emoji. Participants rated sentence + emoji stimuli for emotional valence. ASD-diagnosed and NT participants rated sentences + happy emoji as equally-positive, however, ASD-diagnosed participants rated sentences + sad emoji as more-negative than NT participants. We must acknowledge differential perceptions and effects of emoji, and emoji-text inter-relationships, when working with neurodiverse stakeholders.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderFacial ExpressionAdultEmotionsFearHappinessHumansAutism spectrum disordersDouble empathyEmojiEmotionSocial information processing

Identifiers

PMID35415776
PMCPMC10229741
OpenAlexW4223474407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.