Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35415768›Full record

ReviewAnnals of biomedical engineering2022

Detection of COVID-19 from CT and Chest X-ray Images Using Deep Learning Models.

Wassim Zouch, Dhouha Sagga, Amira Echtioui, Rafik Khemakhem, Mohamed Ghorbel, Chokri Mhiri, Ahmed Ben Hamida

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Dielectric properties of tidal volume changes in rabbit lung tissue in the 100 MHz~1 GHz band].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Publications About COVID-19 Research by the BME Community.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wassim ZouchKing Abdulaziz University (KAU), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. wzouch@kau.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1047-1968
Dhouha SaggaATMS Lab, Advanced Technologies for Medicine and Signals, ENIS, Sfax University, Sfax, Tunisia.
Amira EchtiouiATMS Lab, Advanced Technologies for Medicine and Signals, ENIS, Sfax University, Sfax, Tunisia.
Rafik KhemakhemATMS Lab, Advanced Technologies for Medicine and Signals, ENIS, Sfax University, Sfax, Tunisia.
Mohamed GhorbelATMS Lab, Advanced Technologies for Medicine and Signals, ENIS, Sfax University, Sfax, Tunisia.
Chokri MhiriDepartment of Neurology, Habib Bourguiba University Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia.
Ahmed Ben HamidaATMS Lab, Advanced Technologies for Medicine and Signals, ENIS, Sfax University, Sfax, Tunisia.

Funding

King Abdulaziz University D-473-135-1435
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is a highly transmissible and pathogenic virus caused by severe respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which first appeared in Wuhan, China, and has since spread in the whole world. This pathology has caused a major health crisis in the world. However, the early detection of this anomaly is a key task to minimize their spread. Artificial intelligence is one of the approaches commonly used by researchers to discover the problems it causes and provide solutions. These estimates would help enable health systems to take the necessary steps to diagnose and track cases of COVID. In this review, we intend to offer a novel method of automatic detection of COVID-19 using tomographic images (CT) and radiographic images (Chest X-ray). In order to improve the performance of the detection system for this outbreak, we used two deep learning models: the VGG and ResNet. The results of the experiments show that our proposed models achieved the best accuracy of 99.35 and 96.77% respectively for VGG19 and ResNet50 with all the chest X-ray images.

Indexed as

COVID-19Deep LearningArtificial IntelligenceHumansSARS-CoV-2Tomography, X-Ray ComputedX-RaysChest X-rayConvolutional neural networkCOVID-19CTDeep learning

Identifiers

PMID35415768
PMCPMC9005164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.