Derisking Human Cytomegalovirus Vaccine Clinical Development in Relevant Preclinical Models.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection: From Silent Threat to Vaccine Horizon.Vaccines · 2025
   Review
2. Prevention of Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection: Review and Case Series of Valaciclovir versus Hyperimmune Globulin Therapy.Viruses · 2023
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  In Utero Activation of Natural Killer Cells in Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection.2022

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as