Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35415743›Full record

Trial reportPediatrics2022

mHealth Intervention for Motor Skills: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Amanda E Staiano, Robert L Newton, Robbie A Beyl, Chelsea L Kracht, Chelsea A Hendrick, Matthew Viverito, E Kipling Webster

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03901300 (PLAY), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03901300 nacompletednot on this map

PLAY: An Intervention to Improve Motor Skills in Young Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorPennington Biomedical Research CenterRan2019 to 2020Enrolled72ConditionsPhysical Activity, Fundamental Motor Skills, Development, Child, Self-regulationArmsFundamental Motor Skills App, Unstructured Physical Activity App
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amanda E StaianoPennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Robert L NewtonPennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Robbie A BeylPennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Chelsea L KrachtPennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Chelsea A HendrickPennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Matthew ViveritoPennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
E Kipling WebsterInstitute of Public and Preventive Health, Augusta, Georgia.

Funding

Tracking & Evaluation CoreU54GM104940 · NIGMS · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Peter Todd Katzmarzyk · 2012 to 2026
$69.1M
Research BaseP30DK072476 · NIDDK · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI ROBERT A KESTERSON · 2005 to 2026
$26.5M
Training in Obesity ResearchT32DK064584 · NIDDK · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI CORBY K MARTIN, Christopher D Morrison · 2003 to 2026
$5.3M
“An Intervention to Improve Motor Skills in Young Children”R21HD095035 · NICHD · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI STAIANO, AMANDA E., WEBSTER, ELIZABETH K · 2018 to 2019
$434k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD095035NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK072476NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK064584NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesChildren's motor skills are a critical foundation for physical activity. The objective was to determine the effectiveness and feasibility of a mobile app-based intervention delivered to parents to improve preschoolers' motor skills.

methodsThis randomized controlled trial randomly assigned children to : (1) Motor Skills, including instructional lessons, peer modeling videos, behavioral scaffolding, and structured activities or 2) Free Play. Both groups received a 12-week app-based intervention informed by social cognitive theory to deliver 12 hours (12-minutes per day, 5× per week) of instruction. The children were aged 3 to 5 y; parents and children had no mobility impairments. The primary outcome variables were children's motor skills percentile score assessed with the Test of Gross Motor Development, third edition (TGMD-3) at baseline, end-of-intervention (week 12), and follow-up (week 24); and feasibility and acceptability.

resultsSeventy-two children (4.0 ± 0.8 y) participated. Between baseline and week 12, children in the Motor Skills condition significantly improved total TGMD-3 percentile (+13.7 Motor Skills vs -5.3 Free Play, P < .01), locomotor skills percentile (+15.5 Motor Skills vs -4.8 Free Play, P < .01), and ball skills percentile (+8.3 Motor Skills vs -7.3 Free Play, P < .01) compared with children in the comparator group. Significant differences were sustained at follow-up (week 24). Adherence did not significantly differ between conditions (71% for Motor Skills; 87% for Free Play). Parents in both arms reported high scores on satisfaction, helpfulness, and ease of use.

conclusionsClinicians and educators may encourage parents to enhance their child's motor skills through structured at-home programs.

Indexed as

Motor SkillsTelemedicineChildExerciseHumansParent-Child RelationsParents

Identifiers

PMID35415743
PMCPMC9648112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.