Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35415713›Full record

ArticleWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2022

Experiences of Gender Inequity Among Women Physicians Across Career Stages: Findings from Participant Focus Groups.

Sherry S Chesak, Manisha Salinas, Helayna Abraham, Courtney E Harris, Elise C Carey, Tejinder Khalsa, Karen F Mauck, Molly Feely, Lauren Licatino, Susan Moeschler and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Creation and Program Evaluation of a Women in Surgery in ENT (WISE) Group.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sherry S ChesakDepartment of Nursing, Division of Nursing Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Manisha SalinasDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Helayna AbrahamDepartment of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Courtney E HarrisDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Elise C CareyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Community Internal Medicine, Geriatrics and Palliative Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Tejinder KhalsaDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Karen F MauckDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Molly FeelyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Community Internal Medicine, Geriatrics and Palliative Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Lauren LicatinoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Central Division Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Susan MoeschlerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Anjali BhagraDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Gender inequity in academic medicine persists despite efforts to the contrary. Even with increasing representation of women physicians in academic medicine, leadership positions and promotion to tenure are still not representative. This study describes the experiences of women physicians at various stages of their careers, uncovering current challenges and potential areas for improvement toward gender equity. Methods: Three focus groups were conducted ( Results: The major issues the participants faced included subthemes of (1) systemic barriers to success, (2) implicit biases, (3) self-advocacy, and (4) burnout and stress. Solutions for issues that were discussed included (1) fostering supportive communities, (2) encouraging personal and professional development, and (3) the need for system-wide policy changes. We found that most women needed or benefited from the fostering of communities and desired opportunities for developing professional skills. Participants felt institutional transparency for grievances determined the level of support and confidence in reporting instances of mistreatment. Participants tended to define success according to (1) personal success and (2) leaving a legacy. Conclusions/Implications: Despite policy advancements and a social evolution away from discrimination against women, women in medicine continue to experience inequities across career stages. Potential solutions include fostering supportive communities, encouraging personal and professional development, and system-wide policy changes.

Indexed as

biaschallengesgenderinequitymedicinewomen physicians

Identifiers

PMID35415713
PMCPMC8994436
OpenAlexW4221119575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.