Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35415707›Full record

ArticleWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2022

Facilitators of and Barriers to Successful Implementation of the One Key Question

Meron Ferketa, Kellie Schueler, Bonnie Song, Francesca Carlock, Debra B Stulberg, Emily White VanGompel

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03947788 (One Key Question-System Team Patient), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03947788 nacompletednot on this map

One Key Question-System Team Patient: A Pilot Study Phase II

TypeinterventionalSponsorEndeavor HealthRan2019 to 2021Enrolled143ConditionsReproductive HealthArmsOKQ Training Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Meron FerketaPritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7036-9685
Kellie SchuelerPritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9238-0837
Bonnie SongPritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0767-1347
Francesca CarlockNorthShore University HealthSystem (NSUHS) Research Institute, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
Debra B StulbergPritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Emily White VanGompelPritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0272-0453

Funding

Supporting Vaginal Birth in Illinois: the Role of Unit CultureK08HS028028 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI WHITE VANGOMPEL, EMILY · 2021 to 2024
$581k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS028028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: One Key Question Methods: We invited staff and clinicians from one obstetrics and gynecology clinic and one family medicine clinic, which previously implemented OKQ, to complete surveys and qualitative interviews about their experiences with the tool. The interview guide and thematic analysis of the interview transcripts were informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Main Findings: Major facilitators of OKQ implementation are the simplicity of the tool, engagement of clinic leadership, and compatibility between the perceived goals of the tool and those of practice staff and clinicians. Although participants indicated that OKQ had a minimal impact on clinic workflow during its implementation, preimplementation time concerns were a major barrier to implementation in both clinics. Barriers seen in the family medicine practice included OKQ distracting from the visit agenda, and concerns about the OKQ gold standard protocol of screening each patient at every visit. Participants even suggested asking OKQ only during annual check-up appointments. Conclusions: The perceived alignment between the tool's goals and those of clinic stakeholders was an important facilitator of OKQ implementation success. However, characteristics of the clinic setting, such as competing medical priorities and time constraints, influenced initial attitudes toward the feasibility of the intervention. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT03947788.

Indexed as

contraceptive counselingimplementation sciencepreconception counselingpregnancy intentionsprimary care

Identifiers

PMID35415707
PMCPMC8994428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.