ArticleWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2022
Facilitators of and Barriers to Successful Implementation of the One Key Question
Article in Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03947788 (One Key Question-System Team Patient), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
One Key Question-System Team Patient: A Pilot Study Phase II
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Preexisting Diabetes and Pregnancy: An Endocrine Society and European Society of Endocrinology Joint Clinical Practice Guideline.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Guideline
- Preconception, Interconception, and reproductive health screening tools: A systematic review.Health services research · 2023Pooled it
- Exploring social and public healthcare professionals' experiences providing pregnancy intentions and contraceptive counseling in the Netherlands.AJOG global reports · 2026Article
- Evaluating the use of the consolidated framework for implementation research in primary care settings: a systematic review.Implementation science communications · 2026Review
- Reproductive Health Knowledge and Educational Priorities in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Cross-Sectional Survey of People With CKD.Kidney medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of a person-centered pregnancy prevention question and One Key Question to assess postpartum contraceptive needs.Contraception · 2024Article
- The Impact of New and Renewed Restrictive State Abortion Laws on Pregnancy-Capable People with Diabetes.Current diabetes reports · 2023Review
- Desire to Avoid Pregnancy scale: clinical considerations and comparison with other questions about pregnancy preferences.BMJ sexual & reproductive health · 2023Article
- A blueprint for a new model of sexual and reproductive health care in subspecialty medicine.Health services research · 2023Article
- Shared Decision-Making: The Way Forward for Postpartum Contraceptive Counseling.Open access journal of contraception · 2022Review
- Some key questions: Pregnancy intention screening by community health workers.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: One Key Question Methods: We invited staff and clinicians from one obstetrics and gynecology clinic and one family medicine clinic, which previously implemented OKQ, to complete surveys and qualitative interviews about their experiences with the tool. The interview guide and thematic analysis of the interview transcripts were informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Main Findings: Major facilitators of OKQ implementation are the simplicity of the tool, engagement of clinic leadership, and compatibility between the perceived goals of the tool and those of practice staff and clinicians. Although participants indicated that OKQ had a minimal impact on clinic workflow during its implementation, preimplementation time concerns were a major barrier to implementation in both clinics. Barriers seen in the family medicine practice included OKQ distracting from the visit agenda, and concerns about the OKQ gold standard protocol of screening each patient at every visit. Participants even suggested asking OKQ only during annual check-up appointments. Conclusions: The perceived alignment between the tool's goals and those of clinic stakeholders was an important facilitator of OKQ implementation success. However, characteristics of the clinic setting, such as competing medical priorities and time constraints, influenced initial attitudes toward the feasibility of the intervention. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT03947788.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.