ArticleFood chemistry. Molecular sciences2021
Evaluating the usefulness of next-generation sequencing for herb authentication.
Article in Food chemistry. Molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of DNA barcoding for ensuring food safety and quality.Food science and biotechnology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food authentication is a rapidly growing field driven by increasing public awareness of food quality and safety. Foods containing herbs are particularly prone to industrial fraud and adulteration. Several methodologies are currently used to evaluate food authenticity. DNA-based technologies have increased focus, with DNA barcoding the most widely used. DNA barcoding is based on the sequencing and comparison of orthologous DNA regions from all species in a sample, but the approach is limited by its low resolution to distinguish closely-related species. Here we developed a customised database and bioinformatics pipeline (Herbs Authenticity - GitHub) to identify herbal ingredients implemented as a metagenomics approach for plant-derived product authenticity testing. We evaluated the accuracy of the method by using publicly available plant genomes and databases to allow the construction of our customised database barcodes, which were also complemented with entries from publicly available resources (iBOL and ENA). The pipeline performance was then tested with new 47 de novo partly sequenced whole plant genomes or barcodes as query sequences. Our results show that using our mapping algorithm with the customised barcode database correctly identifies the main components of a wide range of plant-derived samples, albeit with variable additional noise across samples depending on the tested samples and barcodes. Our result also show that at the current stage the usefulness of metagenomics is limited by the availability of reference sequences and the needed sequencing depth. However, this method shows promise for evaluating the authenticity of different herbal products provided that the method is further refined to increase the qualitative and quantitative accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.