ArticleCritical care explorations2022
Predicting Time to Death After Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Measures Using Vital Sign Variability: Derivation and Validation.
Article in Critical care explorations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in intensive care units: a scoping review addressing the translational gap to clinical practice.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Implementation of a controlled DCD program in Western Austria - key considerations and insights.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Article
- Organ donation after death determination by circulatory criteria: family members' experiences with withdrawal of life-sustaining measures in Canadian intensive care units.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2025Article
- Feasibility and Optimization of Donation Advisor: a Decision Support Tool for Deceased Organ Donation and Transplantation.Transplantation direct · 2025Article
- The Association Between the Origin of the Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Recovery Team and Graft Survival: A National Study.Transplantation direct · 2024Article
- Knowledge gaps in the definition and determination of death.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To develop a predictive model using vital sign (heart rate and arterial blood pressure) variability to predict time to death after withdrawal of life-supporting measures.
designRetrospective analysis of observational data prospectively collected as part of the Death Prediction and Physiology after Removal of Therapy study between May 1, 2014, and May 1, 2018.
settingAdult ICU. PATIENTS: Adult patients in the ICU with a planned withdrawal of life-supporting measures and an expectation of imminent death.
interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsVital sign waveforms and clinical data were prospectively collected from 429 patients enrolled from 20 ICUs across Canada, the Czech Republic, and the Netherlands. Vital sign variability metrics were calculated during the hour prior to withdrawal. Patients were randomly assigned to the derivation cohort (288 patients) or the validation cohort (141 patients), of which 103 and 54, respectively, were eligible for organ donation after circulatory death. Random survival forest models were developed to predict the probability of death within 30, 60, and 120 minutes following withdrawal using variability metrics, features from existing clinical models, and/or the physician's prediction of rapid death. A model employing variability metrics alone performed similarly to a model employing clinical features, whereas the combination of variability, clinical features, and physician's prediction achieved the highest area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of all models at 0.78 (0.7-0.86), 0.79 (0.71-0.87), and 0.8 (0.72-0.88) for 30-, 60- and 120-minute predictions, respectively.
conclusionsMachine learning models of vital sign variability data before withdrawal of life-sustaining measures, combined with clinical features and the physician's prediction, are useful to predict time to death. The impact of providing this information for decision support for organ donation merits further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.