ArticleAnnals of breast surgery : an open access journal to bridge breast surgeons across the world2021
Current risk of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a systematic review of epidemiological studies.
Article in Annals of breast surgery : an open access journal to bridge breast surgeons across the world, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Risk of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical recommendations for diagnosis and treatment according to current updated knowledge on BIA-ALCL.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2022Guideline
- Incidence of lymphomas in a nationwide prospective cohort study of breast-implanted women.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Article
- Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction with Polyurethane-Coated Implants: A 117-Patient Single-Center Study with Objective Cosmetic Evaluation.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Do Textured Breast Implants Mitigate Malposition? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Review
- Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL): A Bibliometric Analysis of Publication Trends.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma Related to Breast Implant Presenting as a Solid mass: A Case Report.Case reports in surgery · 2025Article
- Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma presenting as a breast mass: A case report and literature review.International journal of surgery case reports · 2023Article
- Comment on "Reply to Mortality Rate in Breast Implant Surgery: Is an Additional Procedure Worthwhile to Mitigate BIA-ALCL Risk".Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2023Article
- Response to: What Is Missing From the 2022 Practice Recommendation Updates From the World Consensus Conference on BIA-ALCL?Aesthetic surgery journal · 2023Article
- BIA-ALCL-Horizon Scanning.JPRAS open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Recent epidemiological studies have attempted to accurately determine the risk of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). However, comparisons of previously published works are difficult due to widespread variations in reporting. We systematically review the epidemiology in order to better define the current risk of BIA-ALCL. Herein, we report the global epidemiology with an emphasis on the U.S. breast implant population while simultaneously assessing the oncologic safety of smooth-surface devices. In the current manuscript, a systematic review of PubMed and other scientific databases, as well as the grey literature, was conducted for epidemiologic studies on BIA-ALCL. Using analytical and descriptive epidemiology, we estimated the cumulative incidence and incidence rate of BIA-ALCL using a standardized approach. Cumulative incidence was reported at implant and patient-specific levels. The patient-specific cumulative risk within the U.S. market ranges from 1.79 per 1,000 (1:559) to 2.82 per 1,000 (1:355) patients with a textured implant. The implant-specific risk of Allergan textured devices ranges from 1:602-871 to 1:8,500, while the risk of commercially available Mentor Siltex implants is 1:50,000. No epidemiological study or regulatory agency reported a case of BIA-ALCL occurring exclusively with a smooth device. As such, with the removal of Allergan textured breast devices, this study demonstrates substantial gaps in the epidemiological knowledge of BIA-ALCL, including the current risk of commercially available textured breast implants in the U.S. market. Although the risk of BIA-ALCL is low, surgeons should exercise extreme caution when considering the use of a textured breast device for cosmetic or reconstructive purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.