Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35415602›Full record

ArticleAnnals of breast surgery : an open access journal to bridge breast surgeons across the world2021

Current risk of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a systematic review of epidemiological studies.

Evan B Lynch, Ryan C DeCoster, Krishna S Vyas, Brian D Rinker, Mei Yang, Henry C Vasconez, Mark W Clemens

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of breast surgery : an open access journal to bridge breast surgeons across the world, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. BIA-ALCL-Horizon Scanning.JPRAS open · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Evan B LynchDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Ryan C DeCosterDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Krishna S VyasDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Brian D RinkerDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Mei YangDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
Henry C VasconezDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Mark W ClemensDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Kentucky · USMayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USStanford University · US

Funding

Oncology Research Training for Surgeon-ScientistsT32CA160003 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Bernard Mark Evers, Pamela Carmen Hull · 2011 to 2026
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA160003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent epidemiological studies have attempted to accurately determine the risk of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). However, comparisons of previously published works are difficult due to widespread variations in reporting. We systematically review the epidemiology in order to better define the current risk of BIA-ALCL. Herein, we report the global epidemiology with an emphasis on the U.S. breast implant population while simultaneously assessing the oncologic safety of smooth-surface devices. In the current manuscript, a systematic review of PubMed and other scientific databases, as well as the grey literature, was conducted for epidemiologic studies on BIA-ALCL. Using analytical and descriptive epidemiology, we estimated the cumulative incidence and incidence rate of BIA-ALCL using a standardized approach. Cumulative incidence was reported at implant and patient-specific levels. The patient-specific cumulative risk within the U.S. market ranges from 1.79 per 1,000 (1:559) to 2.82 per 1,000 (1:355) patients with a textured implant. The implant-specific risk of Allergan textured devices ranges from 1:602-871 to 1:8,500, while the risk of commercially available Mentor Siltex implants is 1:50,000. No epidemiological study or regulatory agency reported a case of BIA-ALCL occurring exclusively with a smooth device. As such, with the removal of Allergan textured breast devices, this study demonstrates substantial gaps in the epidemiological knowledge of BIA-ALCL, including the current risk of commercially available textured breast implants in the U.S. market. Although the risk of BIA-ALCL is low, surgeons should exercise extreme caution when considering the use of a textured breast device for cosmetic or reconstructive purposes.

Indexed as

breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL)breast implantsepidemiologyLymphomasystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35415602
PMCPMC9000366
OpenAlexW3158143660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.