ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2021
A Novel Supraretinacular Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: Surgical Technique, Clinical Efficacy and Safety (A Series of 48 Consecutive Cases).
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel minimally invasive carpal tunnel release using a specialized surgical kit: a prospective multi-center case series.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Best-Evidence Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release Outcomes.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Endoscopic carpal tunnel release has been shown to have a shorter recovery period than open surgery. This study was aimed at assessing the efficacy and possible clinical complications of a novel supraretinacular endoscopic carpal tunnel release technique. Methods: A total of 50 cases involving 46 patients were evaluated in this prospective study, in which all surgeries were performed by a single surgeon between 2016 and 2018. The patients were evaluated preoperatively; at 3, 7, and 14 days after surgery; and at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. The effectiveness of the surgery was evaluated using pinch and grip strengths, modified table test, visual analog scale pain score, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire symptom severity scale, and the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire functional status scale. The Friedman test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used for a statistical analysis. Results: At 6 months after the surgery, all measured parameters showed improvements. The pinch strength score improved from 2.29 kg before the surgery to 2.96 kg 6 months after the surgery ( Conclusions: This new supraretinacular endoscopic carpal tunnel release technique was shown to be efficacious in this series. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.