ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2021
A Comparative Study of Porcine Small Intestine Submucosa and Cross-Linked Bovine Type I Collagen as a Nerve Conduit.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conservative Safety Assessment of a Nitinol Microhook Coaptation Device on Intact Nerve.Muscle & nerve · 2026Article
- Acellular nerve perineurium repairs peripheral nerve injuries in a rat model via ECM-mediated barrier and optimization of the regenerative microenvironment.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- Enhancement of gastrointestinal anastomosis healing via a small intestinal submucosa bio-patch: modulating IL-22 secretion by type 3 innate lymphoid cells and microbial structures.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Article
- Bridging the Gap: Contemporary Paradigms in Nerve Scaffolds and Regeneration.Advances in wound care · 2025Review
- Review of Gaps in the Clinical Indications and Use of Neural Conduits and Artificial Grafts for Nerve Repair and Reconstruction.Biomacromolecules · 2025Review
- Case Series of Traumatic Peripheral Nerve Injuries in Pediatric Patients Treated with Allograft Repair.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2024Article
- Nerve Coaptation in 2023: Adjuncts to Nerve Repair Beyond Suture.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2024Review
- The application of small intestinal submucosa in tissue regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Histological Comparison of Porcine Small Intestine Submucosa and Bovine Type-I Collagen Conduit for Nerve Repair in a Rat Model.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2023Article
- [Effects of porcine urinary bladder matrix on motility and polarization of bone marrow-derived macrophages in mice].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2023Article
- Implantation of a nerve protector embedded with human GMSC-derived Schwann-like cells accelerates regeneration of crush-injured rat sciatic nerves.Stem cell research & therapy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We compared 2 commercially available nerve conduits-the Axoguard Nerve Connector, made of porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS), and the NeuraGen Nerve Guide, made of cross-linked bovine type I collagen (Col)-using a rodent model at 4 weeks, specifically focusing on subchronic host responses to the implants. Methods: A unilateral 5-mm sciatic nerve defect was created in 18 male Lewis rats and was repaired with SIS or Col conduits. After 4 weeks, histological evaluations of morphology, collagen content, macrophage polarization, vascularization, axonal regeneration, and myelination were conducted. To achieve a blinded examination, an independent qualified pathologist evaluated the images that were stained with hematoxylin-eosin, α-smooth muscle actin, and Masson trichrome stains. Results: The results showed a dominant macrophage type 2 (M2) response in the SIS group and a dominant macrophage type 1 (M1) response in the Col group. The SIS group showed deeper implant vascularization and fibroblast ingrowth than the Col group. Collagen deposition was higher within the lumen of the Col group than the SIS group. All Col conduits were surrounded by a colocalized staining of Masson trichrome and α-smooth muscle actin, forming a capsule-like structure. Conclusion: Distinctive histological features were identified for each conduit at the cellular level. The SIS conduits had a significantly higher number of host macrophages expressing M2 surface marker CD163, and the Col conduits showed a predominance of host macrophages expressing the M1 surface marker CD80. Data suggest that promoting the M2 response for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine is associated with a remodeling response. In addition, an independent analysis revealed an encapsulation-like appearance around all Col conduits, which is similar to what is seen in breast implant capsules. Clinical relevance: The biomaterial choice for conduit material can play an important role in the host tissue response, with the potential to impact adverse events and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.