Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35415568›Full record

ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2021

A Comparative Study of Porcine Small Intestine Submucosa and Cross-Linked Bovine Type I Collagen as a Nerve Conduit.

Rasa Zhukauskas, Debbie Neubauer Fischer, Curt Deister, Nesreen Zoghoul Alsmadi, Deana Mercer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Nerve Coaptation in 2023: Adjuncts to Nerve Repair Beyond Suture.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rasa ZhukauskasAxogen Corporation, Alachua, FL.
Debbie Neubauer FischerAxogen Corporation, Alachua, FL.
Curt DeisterAxogen Corporation, Alachua, FL.
Nesreen Zoghoul AlsmadiAxogen Corporation, Alachua, FL.
Deana MercerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM.
AxoGen (United States) · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We compared 2 commercially available nerve conduits-the Axoguard Nerve Connector, made of porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS), and the NeuraGen Nerve Guide, made of cross-linked bovine type I collagen (Col)-using a rodent model at 4 weeks, specifically focusing on subchronic host responses to the implants. Methods: A unilateral 5-mm sciatic nerve defect was created in 18 male Lewis rats and was repaired with SIS or Col conduits. After 4 weeks, histological evaluations of morphology, collagen content, macrophage polarization, vascularization, axonal regeneration, and myelination were conducted. To achieve a blinded examination, an independent qualified pathologist evaluated the images that were stained with hematoxylin-eosin, α-smooth muscle actin, and Masson trichrome stains. Results: The results showed a dominant macrophage type 2 (M2) response in the SIS group and a dominant macrophage type 1 (M1) response in the Col group. The SIS group showed deeper implant vascularization and fibroblast ingrowth than the Col group. Collagen deposition was higher within the lumen of the Col group than the SIS group. All Col conduits were surrounded by a colocalized staining of Masson trichrome and α-smooth muscle actin, forming a capsule-like structure. Conclusion: Distinctive histological features were identified for each conduit at the cellular level. The SIS conduits had a significantly higher number of host macrophages expressing M2 surface marker CD163, and the Col conduits showed a predominance of host macrophages expressing the M1 surface marker CD80. Data suggest that promoting the M2 response for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine is associated with a remodeling response. In addition, an independent analysis revealed an encapsulation-like appearance around all Col conduits, which is similar to what is seen in breast implant capsules. Clinical relevance: The biomaterial choice for conduit material can play an important role in the host tissue response, with the potential to impact adverse events and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

BiomaterialChronic InflammationConstructive remodelingNerve conduitsNerve injury

Identifiers

PMID35415568
PMCPMC8991869
OpenAlexW3192553479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.