ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2021
Long-Term Follow-Up of Synthetic Ligament (Orthotape) Usage in Reconstructive Surgery of the Hand.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Synthetic ligaments have been widely used in the knees for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and in the shoulder rotator cuff repair, but they have been rarely used in the hand. The only reported usage is in the Artelon space for carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. We describe our experience using the synthetic ligament or scaffold known as Orthotape (its predecessor was known as the Leeds-Keio ligament) in the hand and fingers. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients in whom polyester synthetic ligament (Orthotape) was used to reconstruct absent tendons involving both flexor and extensor compartments between 2011 and 2016. The reconstruction procedures were performed as elective surgeries. The tendons were absent due to either trauma or infection. We collected data on demographics, the injury mechanism, prior surgeries, the zone of tendon loss, the presence of skin flaps, and the number of strips of ligament inserted. Results: We inserted 18 strips of Orthotape in the hands of 9 patients. The follow-up period was 3-7 years, and the mean duration of Orthotape in the hand was 44.1 (range, 1-91) months. Four strips extruded, resulting in a 22.2% extrusion rate. Of the 9 patients, 5 retained the Orthotape within their hand for time periods ranging from 60 months (5 years) to 91 months (7.5 years). The extruded strips were in the superficial areas of the hand. Seven patients had traumatic injuries with varying severity and 2 had infections. Conclusions: The high extrusion rate of Orthotape discourages its use in the superficial areas of the hand, including flexor and extensor surfaces of the fingers and hand. We recommend its usage in regions with a thick skin cover such as underneath a flap or in deep areas such as the palm. Nevertheless, it remains as a possible option in cases of complex reconstruction with a limited availability of donor tendons. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.