Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35415549›Full record

ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2021

Effect of Bicortical Interfragmentary Screw Size on the Fixation of Metacarpal Shaft Fractures: A 3-Dimensional-Printed Biomechanical Study.

Matthew J White, William C H Parr, T Wang, Bernard F Schick, William R Walsh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew J WhiteDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
William C H ParrSurgical and Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
T WangSurgical and Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Bernard F SchickDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
William R WalshSurgical and Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Prince of Wales Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Spiral metacarpal fractures fixed with 2 non-lagged, interfragmentary cortical screws were tested to failure. The effect of screw size (1.2 mm, 1.5 mm, 2.0 mm, and 2.3 mm) on construct strength was tested in 3-point bending. Methods: Three-dimensional-printed metacarpal test models were reproduced from computed tomography scans to reduce the confounding variables of bone density and anatomy, often encountered when using cadavers. Results: No significant difference was found between the screw sizes, and the peak failure force was similar. Drill bit fracture and deformation during the insertion of the smallest screw (1.2 mm) as well as model failure during the insertion of the largest screw (2.3 mm) were found in some cases. Conclusions: Screws of 1.5 mm and 2.0 mm in diameter were of sufficient strength and did not have the issues encountered with smaller or larger screws. Concerns from previous authors regarding intraoperative fracture were consistent with the pre-testing failure of some 2.3-mm models. Clinical Relevance: Screws of 1.5 mm or 2 mm appear adequate for the fixation of spiral fracture patterns in metacarpal shafts using bicortical non-lagged technique with a low risk of fixation complications.

Indexed as

3-dimensional printingFixationFractureMetacarpalScrew

Identifiers

PMID35415549
PMCPMC8991879
OpenAlexW3134610174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.