ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2020
Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound in CTS in Diabetic Versus Nondiabetic Populations.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErrata.2021
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a well-known risk factor for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). However, few studies have compared differences in the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve in patients with and without DM. The purpose of this study was to compare the utility of ultrasound for the diagnosis of CTS in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients. Method: A total of 248 hands of 155 patients were evaluated: 154 hands belonged to non-DM patients with CTS, 80 to DM patients with CTS, 13 patients with DM but no CTS, and 51 patients without DM or CTS. All hands underwent ultrasonography of the median nerve at the wrist for determination of CSA; patients completed a CTS Symptom Severity Scale and Functional Status Scale for each hand. Results: Average CSA (mm Conclusions: Cross-sectional area of the median nerve was similar for patients with and without DM; however, cutoff values for positive diagnosis may need to be adjusted in patients with DM. Ultrasonography of the wrist is a valuable resource for diagnosing CTS in patients with and without DM. Type of study/level of evidence: Diagnostic II.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.