ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2020
Symptom Recurrence After Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Release.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characteristics and outcomes of cubital tunnel decompression in diabetic patients receiving glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2025Article
- Management of Failed Carpal and Cubital Tunnel Release: An Evidence-Based Guide to Success.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the recurrence of symptoms after an endoscopic cubital tunnel release using the technique of Hoffmann and Siemionow. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 286 consecutive patients who underwent Hoffmann and Siemionow's technique of endoscopic cubital release by a single surgeon during an 8-year period. Inclusion criteria were adult patients without previous elbow surgery, pathology, or trauma, and patients with a minimum 3-months' postoperative follow-up. We evaluated symptom recurrence rate and assessed risk factors that would affect recurrence. Results: A total of 223 patients met inclusion criteria, 204 of whom (91.5%) had improvement at 3 months after surgery. Eleven patients (4.9%) had persistent symptoms and 8 (3.6%) had recurrent symptoms at a mean of 16 months (range, 3-93 months) after the primary surgery. Intraoperative ulnar nerve subluxation had a statistically significant relationship with symptom recurrence. Conclusions: Symptoms recurred at a rate of 3.6% after Hoffmann and Siemionow's endoscopic cubital tunnel release. This is comparable to other endoscopic or open techniques for cubital tunnel release. The procedure has the added advantage of less tissue dissection. Intraoperative ulnar nerve subluxation seems to be associated with symptom recurrence. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.