ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2020
Dynavisc as an Adhesion Barrier in Finger Phalangeal Plate Fixation-a Prospective Case Series of 8 Patients.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preventing peritendinous adhesions using lubricious supramolecular hydrogels.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Enhanced Degradability of Thiol-Ene Composites through the Inclusion of Isosorbide-Based Polycarbonates.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024Article
- Prevention of Adhesions after Bone Fracture Using a Carboxymethylcellulose and Polyethylene Oxide Composite Gel in Dogs.Veterinary sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Adhesion problems are common after plate fixation of finger phalanges and often lead to stiffness and reoperations with plate removal and tenolysis. The aim of this prospective case series was to study the effect of the adhesion barrier gel Dynavisc on total active motion (TAM), postoperative pain, and grip strength after plate fixation of phalangeal fractures. Total active motion at 3 months after surgery was the primary outcome. Methods: Eight patients with a fracture of the proximal phalanx underwent surgery with open reduction and plate fixation. The adhesion barrier Dynavisc was applied between plate and extensor tendon and between tendon and skin. Results in terms of pain, grip strength, and TAM at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year after surgery were collected. Results on TAM were classified according to Page and Stern. Results: After 3 months, only 2 patients had a result classified as excellent. After 1 year, 3 patients fulfilled the criteria for an excellent result. There were no adverse events. Patients with long-standing postoperative pain had a worse outcome on TAM. Conclusions: The antiadhesive effect of Dynavisc in this prospective case series was unconvincing. Only 2 patients had an excellent result on TAM at 3 months. Because the gel is resorbed within 30 days after application, it is questionable whether the gel had a role in improvement that occurred later in the postoperative course. Larger, randomized studies would be required to show any anti-adherent effect of Dynavisc definitively in finger fracture surgery. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.