Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35415451›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare informatics research2020

Evaluation of a Concept Mapping Task Using Named Entity Recognition and Normalization in Unstructured Clinical Text.

Sapna Trivedi, Roger Gildersleeve, Sandra Franco, Andrew S Kanter, Afzal Chaudhry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare informatics research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sapna TrivediCambridge Clinical Informatics, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, England UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4184-0164
Roger GildersleeveIntelligent Medical Objects (IMO), Rosemont, IL USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5374-8421
Sandra FrancoIntelligent Medical Objects (IMO), Rosemont, IL USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6440-7091
Andrew S KanterIntelligent Medical Objects (IMO), Rosemont, IL USA.
Afzal ChaudhryCambridge Clinical Informatics, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, England UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this pilot study, we explore the feasibility and accuracy of using a query in a commercial natural language processing engine in a named entity recognition and normalization task to extract a wide spectrum of clinical concepts from free text clinical letters. Editorial guidance developed by two independent clinicians was used to annotate sixty anonymized clinic letters to create the gold standard. Concepts were categorized by semantic type, and labels were applied to indicate contextual attributes such as negation. The natural language processing (NLP) engine was Linguamatics I2E version 5.3.1, equipped with an algorithm for contextualizing words and phrases and an ontology of terms from Intelligent Medical Objects to which those tokens were mapped. Performance of the engine was assessed on a training set of the documents using precision, recall, and the F1 score, with subset analysis for semantic type, accurate negation, exact versus partial conceptual matching, and discontinuous text. The engine underwent tuning, and the final performance was determined for a test set. The test set showed an F1 score of 0.81 and 0.84 using strict and relaxed criteria respectively when appropriate negation was not required and 0.75 and 0.77 when it was. F1 scores were higher when concepts were derived from continuous text only. This pilot study showed that a commercially available NLP engine delivered good overall results for identifying a wide spectrum of structured clinical concepts. Such a system holds promise for extracting concepts from free text to populate problem lists or for data mining projects.

Indexed as

AnnotationClinical lettersGold standardNamed entity recognitionNatural language processingText mining

Identifiers

PMID35415451
PMCPMC8982815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.