Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35415446›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare informatics research2020

Imputation of Missing Data in Electronic Health Records Based on Patients' Similarities.

Ali Jazayeri, Ou Stella Liang, Christopher C Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare informatics research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Predicting abatacept retention using machine learning.Arthritis research & therapy · 2025
    Observational
  12. On operational definitions of mortality.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ali JazayeriCollege of Computing & Informatics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6468-1971
Ou Stella LiangCollege of Computing & Informatics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA USA.
Christopher C YangCollege of Computing & Informatics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using electronic health records (EHR) as the source of data for mining and analysis of different health conditions has become an increasingly common approach. However, due to irregular observation times and other uncertainties inherent in medical settings, the EHR data sets suffer from a large number of missing values. Most of the traditional data mining and machine learning approaches are designed to operate on complete data. In this paper, we propose a novel imputation method for missing data to facilitate using these approaches for the analysis of EHR data. The imputation is based on a set of interpatient, multivariate similarities among patients. For a missing data point in a patient's lab results during his/her intensive care unit stay, the method ranks other patients based on their similarities with the ego patient in terms of lab values, then the missing value is estimated as a weighted average of the known values of the same laboratory test from other patients, considering their similarities as weights. A comparison of the estimated values by the proposed method with values estimated by several common and state-of-the-are methods, such as MICE and 3D-MICE, shows that the proposed method outperforms them and produces promising results.

Indexed as

Electronic health recordsMissing data imputationSimilarity-based imputation

Identifiers

PMID35415446
PMCPMC8982680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.