ArticleJournal of healthcare informatics research2019
Salience of Medical Concepts of Inside Clinical Texts and Outside Medical Records for Referred Cardiovascular Patients.
Article in Journal of healthcare informatics research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The IMPACT framework and implementation for accessible in silico clinical phenotyping in the digital era.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Review
- Contextual Variation of Clinical Notes induced by EHR Migration.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2023Article
- Identifying Information Gaps in Electronic Health Records by Using Natural Language Processing: Gynecologic Surgery History Identification.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Searching the PDF Haystack: Automated Knowledge Discovery in Scanned EHR Documents.Applied clinical informatics · 2021Article
- Probing Patient Messages Enhanced by Natural Language Processing: A Top-Down Message Corpus Analysis.Health data science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Outside medical records (OMRs) accompanying referred patients are frequently sent as faxes from external healthcare providers. Accessing useful and relevant information from these OMRs in a timely manner is a challenging task due to a combination of the presence of machine-illegible information and the limited system interoperability inherent in healthcare. Little research has been done on investigating information in OMRs. This paper evaluated overlapping and non-overlapping medical concepts captured from digitally faxed OMRs for patients transferring to the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine and from clinical consultant notes generated at the Mayo Clinic. We used optical character recognition (OCR) techniques to make faxed OMRs machine-readable and used natural language processing (NLP) techniques to capture clinical concepts from both machine-readable OMRs and Mayo clinical notes. We measured the level of overlap in medical concepts between OMRs and Mayo clinical narratives in the quantitative approaches and assessed the salience of concepts specific to Cardiovascular Medicine by calculating the ratio of those mentioned concepts relative to an independent clinical corpus. Among the concepts collected from the OMRs, 11.19% of those were also present in the Mayo clinical narratives that were generated within the 3 months after their initial encounter at the Mayo Clinic. For those common concepts, 73.97% were identified in initial consultant notes (ICNs) and 26.03% were captured over subsequent follow-up consultant notes (FCNs). These findings implied that information collected from the OMRs is potentially informative for patient care, but some valuable information (additionally identified in FCNs) collected from the OMRs is not fully used in an earlier stage of the care process. The concepts collected from the ICNs have the highest salience to Cardiovascular Medicine (0.112) compared to concepts in OMRs and concepts in FCNs. Additionally, unique concepts captured in ICNs (unseen in OMRs or FCNs) carried the most salient information (0.094), which demonstrated that ICNs provided the most informative concepts for the care of transferred patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.