ArticleJournal of healthcare informatics research2019
Extraction of Temporal Information from Clinical Narratives.
Article in Journal of healthcare informatics research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunological Drug-Drug Interactions in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: Mechanisms, Clinical Evidence, and Artificial Intelligence.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Automated identification of radiotherapy treatment sites from unstructured physician notes.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- AI-Assisted Summarization of Radiologic Reports: Evaluating GPT3davinci, BARTcnn, LongT5booksum, LEDbooksum, LEDlegal, and LEDclinical.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Article
- A Systematic Temporal Extraction Pipeline for Medical Concepts in Clinical Notes.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2023Article
- Information Extraction Framework for Disability Determination Using a Mental Functioning Use-Case.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The existence of massive quantity of clinical text in electronic medical records (EMRs) has created significant demand for clinical text processing and information extraction in the field of health care and medical research. Detailed clinical observations of patients are typically recorded chronologically. Temporal information in such clinical texts consist of three elements: temporal expressions, temporal events, and temporal relations. Due to the implicit expression of temporal information, lack of writing quality, and domain-specific nature in the clinical text, extraction of temporal information is much more complex than for newswire texts. In spite of these difficulties, to extract temporal information using the annotated corpora, few research works reported rule-based, machine-learning, and hybrid methods. On the other hand, creating the annotated corpora is expensive, time-consuming, and demands significant human effort; the processing quality is inevitably affected by the small size of corpora. Motivated by this issue, in this research work, we present a novel method to effectively extract the temporal information from EMR clinical texts. The essential idea of this method is first to build a feature set appropriately for clinical expressions, followed by the development of a semi-supervised framework for temporal event extraction, and finally detection of temporal relations among events with a newly formulated hypothesis. Comparative experimental evaluation on the I2B2 data set has clearly shown improved performance of the proposed methods. Specifically, temporal event and relation extraction is possible with an
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.