ArticleJournal of healthcare informatics research2017
Work-Based Access Control Model for Cooperative Healthcare Environments: Formal Specification and Verification.
Article in Journal of healthcare informatics research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, an access control model for cooperative healthcare environments is presented. A work-based access control (WBAC) model is proposed by introducing the concept of team role classification based on Belbin team role theory and modifying the user-role assignment model from previous work. Roles are used in conjunction with team roles to handle access control in dynamic collaborative environments. To evaluate and analyze the security, efficiency, and practicality of the proposed model, we first formalize the model (events and policies), define the basic element set and relations in the WBAC model, present the WBAC authorization constraints, and define the WBAC access control decision function. Second, we evaluate the model's security and manageability validity to ensure that the security and management requirements of our WBAC model are met. Finally, we evaluate the performance of the proposed model and compare it with relevant existing models. Verification indicates that WBAC is flexible, easy to manage and meets our expectation of allowing fine-grained access control, and it enhances the practicability of access control in dynamic collaboration environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.