Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35415279›Full record

ArticleProgress in rehabilitation medicine2022

Effects of Mobilization among Critically Ill Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: A Single-center Retrospective Study.

Shinichi Watanabe, Keibun Liu, Yasunari Morita, Takahiro Kanaya, Yuji Naito, Shuichi Suzuki, Yoshinori Hasegawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in rehabilitation medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Early mobilization after skin graft for burn injury in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Early Mobilization and Rehabilitation of Critically-Ill Patients.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shinichi WatanabeDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Hospital Organization, Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Keibun LiuCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Australia.
Yasunari MoritaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, National Hospital Organization, Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Takahiro KanayaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Hospital Organization, Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Yuji NaitoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Hospital Organization, Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Shuichi SuzukiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, National Hospital Organization, Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Yoshinori HasegawaNational Hospital Organization, Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study investigated the effect of early mobilization [EM; physical rehabilitation with the intensity needed to sit on the edge of the bed started within 5 days of intensive care unit (ICU) admission] in relation to improvements in gait independence and other clinical outcomes. Methods: This retrospective single-center study evaluated patients aged at least 18 years who stayed in the ICU for at least 48 h and were categorized into EM and late mobilization (LM; physical rehabilitation started more than 5 days after ICU admission) groups. Outcomes were compared after adjusting for 20 background factors by propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting. The primary outcome was independent gait at discharge. The secondary outcomes were medical costs, 90-day survival, and durations of ICU and hospital stays. Results: Of 177 patients, 85 and 92 were enrolled in the EM and LM groups, respectively. Propensity score matching created 37 patient pairs. There was no significant difference in the 90-day survival rate (P=0.308) or medical costs (P=0.054), whereas independent gait at discharge (P=0.025) and duration of hospital stay (P=0.013) differed significantly. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that EM was independently associated with independent gait at discharge (P=0.011) and duration of hospital stay (P=0.010) but was not associated with 90-day survival (odds ratio: 2.64, 95% confidence interval: 0.67-13.12, P=0.169). Conclusions: Early mobilization in the ICU did not affect 90-day survival and did not lower medical costs but was associated with independent gait at discharge and shorter hospital stays.

Indexed as

early mobilizationgait independencemedical costsurvival

Identifiers

PMID35415279
PMCPMC8938413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.