ArticleHealth science reports2022
Consecutive chorioangiomas in the same pregnancy: A clinical case and review of literature.
Article in Health science reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-omic analysis identifies a multi-step pathology in a case of multiple chorangioma syndrome in monochorionic twins.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- The predictive potential of the placental chorioangioma diameter for adverse pregnancy outcomes: a single-centre retrospective study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Multiple giant placental chorioangioma: A case report.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
- A case series of chorioangiomas in placentas with clinical indication for histological examination.Pathologica · 2024Article
- Consecutive chorioangiomas in the same pregnancy: A clinical case and review of literature.Health science reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Aetiopathogenesis of chorioangioma is already unknown. Among the risk factors, hypoxia, environmental and genetic factors are believed to induce the overexpression of angiogenic cytokines promoting vascular proliferation. We reported a case of prenatally diagnosed 67 mm-wide placental chorioangioma, which occurred at 32 weeks of gestational age, infarcted, and followed by the onset of a second infarcted chorioangioma at 35 weeks of gestational age. Besides, we discussed the hypothesis of chorioangioma aetiopathogenesis and behavior through a literature summary. Methods: We carried out a literature search of chorioangioma cases without a time interval. Therefore, we carried out a literature summary on chorioangioma risk factors and etiology, by selecting articles within a time interval from 1995 to 2021. Results: This is the first case of two consecutive chorioangiomas in the same pregnancy published in the literature. We found a possible genetic predisposition in women developing chorioangioma while infarction may be related to the abnormal structure of tumor vessels. The onset of a second lesion could reflect hypoxic stimuli following infarction and involves hypoxia-induced factor-1alpha, vascular endothelial growth factor, transforming growth factor-beta, and soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 pathways. Chorangiosis can be coexistent and may reflect a mutual etiology in susceptible individuals. Conclusion: In a predisposed placenta, that previously generated a chorioangioma, infarction of the chorioangioma should not represent a sign for pregnancy termination, but a marker for closer monitoring to early detect the possible onset of a second chorioangioma and a higher risk of umbilical cord thrombosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.