Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35415218›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2022

Public Understandings of the Definition and Determination of Death: A Scoping Review.

Katina Zheng, Stephanie Sutherland, Laura Hornby, Sam D Shemie, Lindsay Wilson, Aimee J Sarti

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Death pluralism: a proposal.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2023
    Article
  4. Death determination by neurologic criteria-what do families understand?Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023
    Article
  5. Knowledge gaps in the definition and determination of death.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023
    Article
  6. Balancing values: implications of a brain-based definition of death for pluralism in Canada.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katina ZhengFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Stephanie SutherlandDepartment of Critical Care, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Laura HornbyDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Sam D ShemieDivision of Critical Care, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Lindsay WilsonCanadian Blood Services, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Aimee J SartiDepartment of Critical Care, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Advances in medicine and technology that have made it possible to support, repair, or replace failing organs challenge commonly held notions of life and death. The objective of this review is to develop a comprehensive description of the current understandings of the public regarding the meaning/definition and determination of death. Methods: This scoping review was conducted in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Online databases were used to identify articles published from 2003 to 2021. Two reviewers (S.S. and K.Z.) screened the articles using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data for specific content variables, and performed descriptive examination. Complementary searches of reference lists complemented the final study selection. A search strategy using vocabulary of the respective databases was created, and criteria for the inclusion and exclusion of the articles were established. Results: Seven thousand four hundred twenty-eight references were identified. Sixty were retained for analysis, with 4 additional references added from complementary searches. A data extraction instrument was developed to iteratively chart the results. A qualitative approach was conducted to thematically analyze the data. Themes included public understanding/attitudes toward death and determination of death (neurological determination and cardiocirculatory determination of death), death and organ donation, public trust and legal variability, and media impacts. Conclusions: This review provides a current and comprehensive overview of the literature related to the general public's understanding and attitudes toward death and death determination and serves to highlight the gaps in this topic.

Identifiers

PMID35415218
PMCPMC8989773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.