ArticleCureus2022
Nipple Adenoma: Case Report of a Rare Entity.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Concurrent intraductal papilloma and nipple adenoma: a case report and review of the literature.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A nipple adenoma is a rare benign breast tumor. The commonest presentation of this rare entity is nipple erosion, serosanguinous discharge, induration, or tumor formation at the nipple. It often mimics malignant breast lesions or nipple eczema and is mistaken for Paget's disease of the nipple or dermatological pathology. It may be misdiagnosed pathologically as ductal carcinoma of the breast. This may cause a diagnostic delay or a faulty diagnosis. Treatment is the excision of the tumor with or without nipple excision. Here, we report a case of nipple adenoma that projected out of the nipple along with nipple erosion, serosanguinous discharge, and occasional bleeding from the adenoma. A 37- year-old woman presented with a tumor on her right nipple for eight months, with the erosion of the nipple and serosanguinous discharge. The patient gave a history of a small amount of bleeding occasionally. Axilla was normal. The patient was advised to have a mammosonography. It showed an oval-shaped, well-demarcated, hypoechoic, uniformly solid nodule in the right nipple. There was no microcalcification seen on mammography. A punch biopsy was done to establish the diagnosis. It showed ductal hyperplasia and papillary proliferation of glandular structures suggestive of nipple adenoma. Complete resection of the tumor with partial excision of the nipple was done with a satisfactory cosmetic result. Though very uncommon, the possibility of nipple adenoma should be thought of when a patient presents with nipple erosion and discharge with or without a clinically obvious tumor. Timely diagnosis with histopathological correlation is important since it allows for less invasive surgical methods. In our case, we could attain a cosmetically satisfactory outcome without a remnant tumor. Paget's disease of the nipple also has a similar clinical presentation, and it is a premalignant condition. The objective of presenting this case is to highlight the possibility of this rare benign condition, which may be easily missed clinically and also demands careful histopathological examination for its correct diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.