Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35415038›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

The Role of Myositis-Specific Autoantibodies in the Dermatomyositis Spectrum.

Harshita Marasandra Ramesh, Sai Sreeya Gude, Shravya Venugopal, Nikhil Chowdary Peddi, Sai Sravya Gude, Sravya Vuppalapati

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Research progress on the dermatomyositis specific autoantibodies and malignancy associated dermatomyositis.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Case Report of Anti-TIF1-Case reports in rheumatology · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Harshita Marasandra RameshInternal Medicine/Pediatrics, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Mangalore, IND.
Sai Sreeya GudeInternal Medicine, Guntur Medical College, Guntur, IND.
Shravya VenugopalInternal Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Mangalore, IND.
Nikhil Chowdary PeddiPediatrics, PES Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Kuppam, IND.
Sai Sravya GudePediatrics, Guntur Medical College, Guntur, IND.
Sravya VuppalapatiPaediatrics, PES Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Kuppam, IND.
Guntur Medical College · INInstitute of Medical Sciences · INKasturba Medical College, MangaloreKasturba Medical College, Manipal · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dermatomyositis (DM) is a systemic autoimmune disease that affects skeletal muscles, the skin, and the lungs. It is characterized by autoantibodies, tissue inflammation, parenchymal cell damage, death, and vasculopathy. In terms of epidemiology, DM affects both children and adults. The current pathophysiology of DM is described as an autoimmune attack on the afflicted organs driven by environmental variables such as UV exposure, medications, infections, and lifestyle choices in genetically predisposed people. DM is also a paraneoplastic condition, which means that cancer may arise before, along with, or following the development of the symptoms of DM. Myositis-specific autoantibodies are associated with phenotypical features and are used for sub-classification of dermatomyositis patients. Because the risk of interstitial lung disease (ILD), internal malignancy, destructive disease trajectory, and maybe a response to medication differs by DM myositis-specific antibody (MSA) group, a better knowledge of MSAs and the validation and standardization of tests employed for detection is crucial for improving diagnosis and treatment. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of tests for various MSAs are not ideal, just like with any other test. However, more antibody tests are anticipated to make their way into formal schemata for diagnosis and actionable risk assessment in DM due to worldwide standardization and more extensive research. In this review, we outline crucial aspects for interpreting clinical and pathologic relationships with MSA in DM and critical knowledge and practice gaps that will optimize the clinical benefit and utility of MSAs as diagnostic and prognostic markers.

Indexed as

adult-onset dermatomyositisauto antibodiesauto immunejuvenile dermatomyositispopulations genetics

Identifiers

PMID35415038
PMCPMC8990210
OpenAlexW4220974003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.