ArticleBiomedical optics express2022
Bioluminescence tomography reconstruction in conjunction with an organ probability map as an anatomical reference.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative Assessment on Optical Properties as a Basis for Bioluminescence Imaging: An Experimental and Numerical Approach to the Transport of Optical Photons in Phantom Materials.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Erratum: Bioluminescence tomography reconstruction in conjunction with an organ probability map as an anatomical reference: erratum.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To alleviate the ill-posedness of bioluminescence tomography (BLT) reconstruction, anatomical information from computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is usually adopted to improve the reconstruction quality. With the anatomical information, different organs could be segmented and assigned with appropriate optical parameters, and the reconstruction could be confined into certain organs. However, image segmentation is a time-consuming and challenging work, especially for the low-contrast organs. In this paper, we present a BLT reconstruction method in conjunction with an organ probability map to effectively incorporate the anatomical information. Instead of using a segmentation with a fixed organ map, an organ probability map is established by registering the CT image of the mouse to the statistical mouse atlas with the constraints of the mouse surface and high-contrast organs (bone and lung). Then the organ probability map of the low-contrast organs, such as the liver and kidney, is determined automatically. After discretization of the mouse torso, a heterogeneous model is established as the input for reconstruction, in which the optical parameter of each node is calculated according to the organ probability map. To take the advantage of the sparse Bayesian Learning (SBL) method in recovering block sparse signals in inverse problems, which is common in BLT applications where the target distribution has the characteristic of sparsity and block structure, a two-step method in conjunction with the organ probability map is presented. In the first step, a fast sparse algorithm, L1-LS, is used to reveal the source distribution on the organ level. In the second step, the bioluminescent source is reconstructed on the pixel level based on the SBL method. Both simulation and
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.