Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35414979›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2022

Analysis of polarized diffraction images of human red blood cells: a numerical study.

Wenjin Wang, Li Min, Peng Tian, Chao Wu, Jing Liu, Xin-Hua Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wenjin WangInstitute for Advanced Optics, Hunan Institute of Science and Technology, Yueyang, Hunan 414006, China.
Li MinInstitute for Advanced Optics, Hunan Institute of Science and Technology, Yueyang, Hunan 414006, China.
Peng TianInstitute for Advanced Optics, Hunan Institute of Science and Technology, Yueyang, Hunan 414006, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3757-8298
Chao WuInstitute for Advanced Optics, Hunan Institute of Science and Technology, Yueyang, Hunan 414006, China.
Jing LiuInstitute for Advanced Optics, Hunan Institute of Science and Technology, Yueyang, Hunan 414006, China.
Xin-Hua HuInstitute for Advanced Optics, Hunan Institute of Science and Technology, Yueyang, Hunan 414006, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4353-9028

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We carried out a systematic study on cross-polarized diffraction image (p-DI) pairs of 3098 mature red blood cells (RBCs) using optical cell models with varied morphology, refractive index (RI), and orientation. The influence of cell rotation on texture features of p-DI pairs characterized by the gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) algorithm was quantitatively analyzed. Correlations between the transverse diameters of RBCs with different RI values and scattering efficiency ratios of s- and p-polarized light were also investigated. The correlations remain strong even for RBCs with significant orientation variations. In addition, we applied a minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) algorithm to improve the performance of support vector machine (SVM) classifiers. It was demonstrated that a set of selected GLCM parameters allowed for an efficient solution of classification problems of RBCs based on morphology. For 1598 RBCs with varied shapes corresponding to normal or pathological cases, the accuracy of the SVM based classifications increased from 83.8% to 96.8% with the aid of mRMR. These results indicate the strong potential of p-DI data for rapid and accurate screening examinations of RGC shapes in routine clinical tests.

Identifiers

PMID35414979
PMCPMC8973179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.