ArticleBiomedical optics express2022
Elimination of stripe artifacts in light sheet fluorescence microscopy using an attention-based residual neural network.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artifact detection in fluorescence microscopy using convolutional autoencoder.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhancing brain image quality with 3D U-net for stripe removal in light sheet fluorescence microscopy.Brain informatics · 2024Article
- Distortion Correction and Denoising of Light Sheet Fluorescence Images.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Optical Encryption Using Attention-Inserted Physics-Driven Single-Pixel Imaging.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Unveiling precision: a data-driven approach to enhance photoacoustic imaging with sparse data.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Combined flat-field and frequency filter approach to correcting artifacts of multichannel two-photon microscopy.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stripe artifacts can deteriorate the quality of light sheet fluorescence microscopy (LSFM) images. Owing to the inhomogeneous, high-absorption, or scattering objects located in the excitation light path, stripe artifacts are generated in LSFM images in various directions and types, such as horizontal, anisotropic, or multidirectional anisotropic. These artifacts severely degrade the quality of LSFM images. To address this issue, we proposed a new deep-learning-based approach for the elimination of stripe artifacts. This method utilizes an encoder-decoder structure of UNet integrated with residual blocks and attention modules between successive convolutional layers. Our attention module was implemented in the residual blocks to learn useful features and suppress the residual features. The proposed network was trained and validated by generating three different degradation datasets with different types of stripe artifacts in LSFM images. Our method can effectively remove different stripes in generated and actual LSFM images distorted by stripe artifacts. Besides, quantitative analysis and extensive comparison results demonstrated that our method performs the best compared with classical image-based processing algorithms and other powerful deep-learning-based destriping methods for all three generated datasets. Thus, our method has tremendous application prospects to LSFM, and its use can be easily extended to images reconstructed by other modalities affected by the presence of stripe artifacts.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.