Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35414939›Full record

ArticleVeterinary record open2022

The use of a whole inactivated PRRS virus vaccine administered in sows and impact on maternally derived immunity and timing of PRRS virus infection in piglets.

Gerard Eduard Martín-Valls, Preben Mortensen, Hepzibar Clilvert, Yanli Li, Martí Cortey, Melanie Sno, Timea Barna, Marisa Terré, Nicolas Guerra, Enric Mateu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary record open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gerard Eduard Martín-VallsDepartament de Sanitat i Anatomia Animals Facultat de Veterinària Travessera dels Turons s/n Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain.
Preben MortensenCeva Santé Animale Libourne France.
Hepzibar ClilvertDepartament de Sanitat i Anatomia Animals Facultat de Veterinària Travessera dels Turons s/n Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain.
Yanli LiDepartament de Sanitat i Anatomia Animals Facultat de Veterinària Travessera dels Turons s/n Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain.
Martí CorteyDepartament de Sanitat i Anatomia Animals Facultat de Veterinària Travessera dels Turons s/n Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain.
Melanie SnoCeva Animal Health Ceva Phylaxia Veterinary Biologicals Co. Ltd., Budapest Hungary.
Timea BarnaCeva Animal Health Ceva Phylaxia Veterinary Biologicals Co. Ltd., Budapest Hungary.
Marisa TerréCooperativa d'Artesa de Segre Artesa de Segre Lleida Spain.
Nicolas GuerraCeva Santé Animale Libourne France.
Enric MateuDepartament de Sanitat i Anatomia Animals Facultat de Veterinària Travessera dels Turons s/n Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESCeva Animal Health (United Kingdom) · GBEndesa (Spain) · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) vaccination is usually based on administering periodically PRRS modified live virus (MLV) in sows throughout their life. Using this schedule, transfer of maternally derived antibodies to the offspring is limited. The aim of the present study was to test the concept of priming with an MLV and boosting with a commercial inactivated virus vaccine in sows to reduce PRRSV incidence and improve productivity. Methods: On two farms, all the sows were vaccinated with a MLV vaccine at week 8 of gestation. Then two groups were designated, one group was re-vaccinated in the third week prior to farrowing and using a commercial inactivated vaccine (the PG group). The second group was the control group (C). Assays for PRRSV infection and productive parameters were evaluated. Results: For both farms, the incidence of PRRSV was lower at 6 weeks of age in PG than in C ( Conclusions: Administration of the vaccine in sows before farrowing was safe and associated with reduced incidence of PRRSV in piglets up to 6 weeks of age.

Identifiers

PMID35414939
PMCPMC8982505
OpenAlexW4223413419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.