Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35414891›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2022

Exosymbiotic microbes within fermented pollen provisions are as important for the development of solitary bees as the pollen itself.

Prarthana S Dharampal, Bryan N Danforth, Shawn A Steffan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pollen nutrition structures bee and plant community interactions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Prarthana S DharampalDepartment of Entomology University of Wisconsin Madison Wisconsin USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7635-7079
Bryan N DanforthDepartment of Entomology Cornell University Ithaca New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6495-428X
Shawn A SteffanDepartment of Entomology University of Wisconsin Madison Wisconsin USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2219-6409

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing bees derive significant benefits from the microbes present within their guts and fermenting pollen provisions. External microbial symbionts (exosymbionts) associated with larval diets may be particularly important for solitary bees that suffer reduced fitness when denied microbe-colonized pollen.To investigate whether this phenomenon is generalizable across foraging strategy, we examined the effects of exosymbiont presence/absence across two solitary bee species, a pollen specialist and generalist. Larvae from each species were reared on either microbe-rich natural or microbe-deficient sterilized pollen provisions allocated by a female forager belonging to their own species (conspecific-sourced pollen) or that of another species (heterospecific-sourced pollen). Our results reveal that the presence of pollen-associated microbes was critical for the survival of both the generalist and specialist larvae, regardless of whether the pollen was sourced from a conspecific or heterospecific forager.Given the positive effects of exosymbiotic microbes for larval fitness, we then examined if the magnitude of this benefit varied based on whether the microbes were provisioned by a conspecific forager (the mother bee) or a heterospecific forager. In this second study, generalist larvae were reared only on microbe-rich pollen provisions, but importantly, the sources (conspecific versus heterospecific) of the microbes and pollen were experimentally manipulated.Bee fitness metrics indicated that microbial and pollen sourcing both had significant impacts on larval performance, and the effect sizes of each were similar. Moreover, the effects of conspecific-sourced microbes and conspecific-sourced pollen were strongly positive, while that of heterospecific-sourced microbes and heterospecific-sourced pollen, strongly negative.Our findings imply that not only is the presence of exosymbionts critical for both specialist and generalist solitary bees, but more notably, that the composition of the specific microbial community within larval pollen provisions may be as critical for bee development as the composition of the pollen itself.

Indexed as

bee–microbe symbiosesexosymbiontslarval fitnessoligolegepollen provisionspolylegesolitary bees

Identifiers

PMID35414891
PMCPMC8986510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.