ReviewMethodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal2022
Clinical Clues and Diagnostic Workup of Cardiac Amyloidosis.
Review in Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning-based methods in diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Elevated filling pressures but rare restrictive physiology in transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy: genotype-specific patterns and the role of left atrial strain.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Systemic Amyloidosis With Probable Cardiac Involvement: Diagnostic Approach in a Resource-Limited Setting: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Exploring the MicroRNA Landscape in Cardiac Amyloidosis: Molecular Insights and Clinical Applications.Genes · 2026Review
- Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac scintigraphy in the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis: A meta-analysis of 4866 patients.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2025Article
- Navigating Diagnostic Ambiguities in Cardiac Amyloidosis: Insights from a Case with Delayed Diagnosis of AL Amyloidosis.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
- Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Literature Review.Cardiology research · 2024Review
- Article
- British Society of Echocardiography guideline for the transthoracic echocardiographic assessment of cardiac amyloidosis.Echo research and practice · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac amyloidosis is increasingly recognized as an underlying cause of left ventricular wall thickening, heart failure, and arrhythmia with variable clinical presentation. Due to the subtle cardiac findings in early transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis and the availability of therapies that can modify but not reverse the disease progression, early recognition is vital. In light chain amyloidosis, timely diagnosis and treatment can significantly improve survival. In this manuscript, we review the clinical, imaging, and electrocardiographic clues that should raise suspicion for cardiac amyloidosis and provide a simplified diagnostic workup algorithm that ensures an accurate diagnosis. The evolution of the noninvasive diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis has significantly influenced our understanding of disease prevalence, presentations, and outcomes. However, clinical recognition of clues and red flags remains the most important factor in advancing the care of patients with cardiac amyloidosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.