Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35414705›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Barrier effect and wound healing activity of the medical device REF-FTP78 in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Tiziana M G Pecora, Ortensia Ilaria Parisi, Walter Bertin, Barbara Ragazzo, Marco Dattilo, Norma Scigliano, Rocco Malivindi, Fabio Amone, Francesco Puoci

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Characterizations of Six Pomegranate (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tiziana M G PecoraLabomar SpA, via Nazario Sauro 35/I, Istrana, 31036, Treviso, Italy.
Ortensia Ilaria ParisiDepartment of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, 87036, Rende, CS, Italy. ortensiailaria.parisi@unical.it.
Walter BertinLabomar SpA, via Nazario Sauro 35/I, Istrana, 31036, Treviso, Italy.
Barbara RagazzoLabomar SpA, via Nazario Sauro 35/I, Istrana, 31036, Treviso, Italy.
Marco DattiloDepartment of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, 87036, Rende, CS, Italy.
Norma SciglianoMacrofarm S.R.L., c/o Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, 87036, Rende, CS, Italy.
Rocco MalivindiDepartment of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, 87036, Rende, CS, Italy.
Fabio AmoneMacrofarm S.R.L., c/o Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, 87036, Rende, CS, Italy.
Francesco PuociDepartment of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, 87036, Rende, CS, Italy. francesco.puoci@unical.it.
University of Calabria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

REF-FTP78 is a class IIb medical device present on the market with different trade names and developed for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This medical device is based on polysaccharides from Aloe Barbadensis and fucoidans from brown seaweeds, such as Undaria pinnatifida and Fucus vesiculosus, and aims to exert a protective effect on the esophageal mucosa against the noxious components of refluxate. The present study reports on the efficacy of REF-FTP78 devoting a particular attention to the barrier effect and wound healing properties, combined with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities. Film-forming properties and barrier effect were investigated on in vitro reconstructed human esophageal epithelium, through TEER measurement and evaluation of caffeine and Lucifer yellow permeability, and in an ex vivo swine model of esophageal mucosa damage. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties were evaluated in terms of scavenging activity towards DPPH, ABTS and NO radicals and a wound healing assay was carried out to study the influence of the product on cell migration. The obtained results highlighted a significant barrier effect, with a reduction in caffeine penetration equal to 65.3%, the ability to both repair and prevent the damage caused by an acid insult, confirmed by a good transepithelial resistance for the tissue treated with the tested item, and the capacity to promote wound healing. Furthermore, the tested product showed good antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties in the performed radical scavenging assays. These findings support the use of REF-FTP78 in the treatment of GERD.

Indexed as

AntioxidantsGastroesophageal RefluxAnimalsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCaffeineSwineWound HealingAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntioxidantsCaffeine

Identifiers

PMID35414705
PMCPMC9005723
OpenAlexW4223473718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.