Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35414675›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Organic residue analysis reveals the function of bronze age metal daggers.

Isabella Caricola, Alasdair Charles, Jacopo Tirillò, Fraser Charlton, Huw Barton, Francesco Breglia, Alberto Rossi, Maria Chiara Deflorian, Anna Maria De Marinis, Susanna Harris and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Isabella CaricolaSchool of History, Classics and Archaeology, Newcastle University, Armstrong Building, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK. isabellacaricola@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7808-3748
Alasdair CharlesSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
Jacopo TirillòDipartimento Ingegneria Chimica Materiali Ambiente, Sapienza University, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Fraser CharltonCellular Pathology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK.
Huw BartonSchool of Archaeology and Ancient History, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
Francesco BregliaDipartimento di Beni Culturali, Salento University, 73100, Lecce, Italy.
Alberto RossiOfficina Temporis, 60026, Marche, Italy.
Maria Chiara DeflorianMUSE-Museo delle Scienze, 38122, Trento, Italy.
Anna Maria De MarinisIstituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale ISPRA, Ozzano dell'Emilia, 40064, Bologna, Italy.
Susanna HarrisSchool of Humanities, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, Scotland.
Alessio PellegriniDepartment of Classics, Sapienza University, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Federico ScacchettiArcheosistemi, 42124, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Paolo BoccucciaMinistero della Cultura, Museo delle Civiltà, 00144, Rome, Italy.
Monica MiariSoprintendenza Archeologia Belle Arti e Paesaggio per la Città Metropolitana di Bologna e le Province di Modena, Reggio Emilia e Ferrara, 40123, Bologna, Italy.
Andrea DolfiniSchool of History, Classics and Archaeology, Newcastle University, Armstrong Building, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK. andrea.dolfini@newcastle.ac.uk.

Funding

Marie Curie 798688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The article discusses results of organic residue analysis performed on ten copper-alloy daggers from Bronze Age Pragatto, Italy, c.1550-1250 BCE. Metal daggers are widespread in Chalcolithic and Bronze Age Europe, yet their social and practical roles are still hotly debated. Are they symbolic or functional? Are they tools or weapons? How were they used? For what tasks and on what materials? The research addresses these questions through a novel application of biochemical staining and SEM-EDX analysis. The method has proved successful in extracting and identifying animal residues located on cutting edges including bone, muscle, and tendons. These are interpreted as evidence of prehistoric carcass butchering and carving. Further residues were observed on blade faces and hafting plates or tangs; these are interpreted as remnants of bone handles and sheaths, the latter made of either wood fibers or processed hide and fur. The readings proposed in the article are validated by original experiments with replica daggers, as detailed in the Supplementary Materials. The analysis and experiments shed new light on Bronze Age metal daggers, showing that they were fully functional tools (and perhaps tool-weapons) primarily utilized for the processing of animal carcasses. This original research result contributes significant knowledge towards interpreting an under-studied, yet socially salient, prehistoric metal artifact.

Indexed as

AlloysMetalsAnimalsCopperEuropeItalyAlloysCopperMetals

Identifiers

PMID35414675
PMCPMC9005664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.