Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35414552›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Pattern of contraceptive use, determinants and fertility intentions among tribal women in Kerala, India: a cross-sectional study.

Aswathy Sreedevi, Krishnapillai Vijayakumar, Shana Shirin Najeeb, Vishnu Menon, Minu Maria Mathew, Lakshmi Aravindan, Rithima Anwar, Syama Sathish, Prema Nedungadi, Viroj Wiwanitkit and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aswathy SreedeviCommunity Medicine, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Cochin, India draswathygopan@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6037-9265
Krishnapillai VijayakumarCommunity Medicine, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Cochin, India.
Shana Shirin NajeebCommunity Medicine, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Cochin, India.
Vishnu MenonCommunity Medicine, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Cochin, India.
Minu Maria MathewCommunity Medicine, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Cochin, India.
Lakshmi AravindanCommunity Medicine, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Cochin, India.
Rithima AnwarCommunity Medicine, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Cochin, India.
Syama SathishCommunity Medicine, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Cochin, India.
Prema NedungadiCommunity Medicine, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Cochin, India.
Viroj WiwanitkitDepartment of Community Medicine, Dr D Y Patil Vidyapeeth University, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Raghu RamanAmrita Create, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham Amrita School of Engineering Amritapuri, Kollam, Kerala, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0851-9742
Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre · INAmrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham · INDr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the pattern of contraceptive use and its determinants, knowledge regarding contraceptives including oral contraceptive pills and fertility intentions among tribal women in the reproductive age group.

designCommunity-based cross-sectional study.

settingCommunity development blocks in a predominantly tribal district of Wayanad in Kerala, India.

participantsWomen in the reproductive age group (15-49 years) from the tribal groups in the district numbering 2495. OUTCOME MEASURES: PRIMARY: Prevalence of contraceptive use and its determinants. SECONDARY: Knowledge regarding contraceptives in general, oral contraceptives and fertility intentions.

resultsThe mean age of the study participants was 30.8 years (SD=9.8) and belonged to various tribal groups such as Paniya (59.2%), Kurichiyar (13.6%) and Adiya (10.9%). Current use of contraceptive was reported by about a fourth, 658 (26.4%) (95% CI 27.9 to 24.9) of women. Following logistic regression, belonging to Paniya tribe (adjusted OR (aOR) 2.67, 95% CI 1.49 to 4.77; p<0.001) and age at menarche >13 years (aOR 1.69, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.52; p<0.009) had significantly higher use of contraceptives whereas social vulnerability as indicated by staying in a kutcha house had a lesser likelihood of use of contraceptive (aOR 0.55, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.95; p<0.03). Oral contraceptive use was low (4.8%) among this population and no abuse was observed.Less than half (47%) of the respondents had an above average knowledge on contraception. Multivariable logistic regression indicated that above average knowledge was 2.2 times more likely with higher education (95% CI 1.2 to 3.9), lesser among those who desired more than two children (aOR 0.59; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.94; p<0.02).Two children per family was the preferred choice for 1060 (42.5%) women. No gender bias in favour of the male child was observed.

conclusionAwareness and use of contraceptives are poor though the fertility is not commensurately high. Along with developing targeted responses to contraceptive use among Indigenous people with indigenous data, awareness also requires attention. Ethnographic studies are also necessary to determine the differences in contraceptive use including traditional methods among the various Indigenous groups.

Indexed as

Contraception BehaviorIntentionAdolescentAdultChildContraceptionContraceptives, OralCross-Sectional StudiesFamily Planning ServicesFemaleFertilityHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultContraceptives, OralCommunity gynaecologyEPIDEMIOLOGYPREVENTIVE MEDICINEPUBLIC HEALTHReproductive medicine

Identifiers

PMID35414552
PMCPMC9006194
OpenAlexW4223454917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.