Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35414278›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of ophthalmology2022

Tips to optimize digital education in ophthalmology: Results from ESASO survey.

Mariantonia Ferrara, Vito Romano, Claudio Iovino, Mustafa R Kadhim, Elon Hc van Dijk, Camiel Jf Boon, Piergiacomo Grassi, Sibel Demirel, Cristian Cartes, Mario R Romano and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mariantonia FerraraNewcastle Eye Centre, 105563Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1191-4989
Vito RomanoDepartment of Corneal and External Eye Diseases, St Paul's Eye Unit, 159020Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5148-7643
Claudio IovinoEye Clinic, Multidisciplinary Department of Medical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, 18994University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1984-0555
Mustafa R KadhimNewcastle Eye Centre, 105563Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Elon Hc van DijkDepartment of Ophthalmology, 4501Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Camiel Jf BoonDepartment of Ophthalmology, 4501Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Piergiacomo Grassi4960Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8741-5919
Sibel DemirelDepartment of Ophthalmology, 63990Ankara University School of Medicine, Mamak Street Vehbi Koç Eye Hospital, Dikimevi, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6430-6565
Cristian CartesUnidad oftalmologia, departamento especialidades, Facultad de Medicina, 28057Universidad de la Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
Mario R RomanoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, 437807Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele - Milano, Italy.
e-LOS Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify audience and faculty preferences to optimize digital education sessions in ophthalmology.

methodsWe distributed an online survey to ophthalmology trainees and specialists worldwide. The survey investigated respondents' preferences on various findings of hypothetical digital educational sessions. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact probability and ANOVA tests.

resultsThe survey was completed by 655 respondents, from 53 different countries. According to most respondents, the optimal duration and timeframe for a valuable digital education session would be 30-60 min, without a break (52%), in the evening time-slot (6-8 p.m.) (45%) of a weekday (Monday-Thursday) (46%), regardless of age (

conclusionAppropriate planning of timing and structure of digital educational ophthalmology sessions may optimize their effectiveness. Using multiple e-learning formats may be helpful to ensure the continuity of learning activities, also in view of a long-term replacement of traditional in-person education.

Indexed as

Digital educationlearningophthalmologyophthalmology trainingprofessional educationsurveyteaching

Identifiers

PMID35414278
PMCPMC9999274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.